A Boring Dystopia

16194 readers

100 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

givesomefucks@lemmy.world

289

AI companies try to pay staff in AI tokens, not money (pivot-to-ai.com)

submitted 2 weeks ago by resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world to c/aboringdystopia@lemmy.world

47 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://awful.systems/post/7579135

I owe my SOUL․md to the company store

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IpoCzQ-va94&list=UU9rJrMVgcXTfa8xuMnbhAEA - video
https://pivottoai.libsyn.com/20260312-ai-companies-try-to-pay-staff-in-ai-tokens-not-money - podcast

time: 6 min 57 sec

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] GarboDog@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

??????? That’s not how getting paid works??????????

[–] inari@piefed.zip 8 points 2 weeks ago

Can't pay 'em if you got no revenue

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The Business Insider article this article references makes a big stretch to try to frame it as compensation:

In other words, access to AI may soon matter as much as access to a fat salary and juicy equity awards. As a coder in the AI era, if you don't have access to massive compute, you might end up producing far less software than your colleagues, threatening your career prospects.

But what they're talking about is pretty clearly a business expense and not payment, because it's something they only get to use at work in order to do their job.

[–] GarboDog@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

That’s stupid. That’s like saying “instead of paying you a livable wage, here’s some pants! I mean you need to wear pants for work right? You can use them at home too!”

Mf really out here thinking we use AI let alone wear pants in our own dang home. We want to cold hard cash! 💶💶💶!!! Lol

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Pretty much literally what company stores used to do/what they want to do again. Except pants were an actual, useful, tangible thing.

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I don't think they are even going to allow them to use these credits at home honestly, the whole idea is just that being able to claim that a previous job gave you $X in AI credits is valuable for a resume and and so counts as compensation. They aren't even talking about AI companies themselves doing this, it's speculation about other companies spending 100k a year per worker on AI and why that would be worth it. Kind of what you would expect from an article that is mostly about things people said on LinkedIn I guess.