Asklemmy

53558 readers

760 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago

MODERATORS

199

Which career path is not ruined by AI? (lemmy.zip)

submitted 2 days ago by underscores@lemmy.zip to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

167 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I'm kind of sick of being a dev. I hate AI with a passion.

I hate the hallucinations, I hate slop, I hate megacrops, I hate the environmental impacts, I hate the massive costs. I could go on but you get the picture.

At work I often times have to review vibe code slop from people who clock in 9 to 5 and don't give a fuck (I respect that, I just wish your fucking code wasn't slop)

I'm sick of it, I'm sick of hearing about AI tooling or new models or bro agentic actions bro based on your documentation bro.

I want to switch careers, so which career is not ruined by AI?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I’m there too. But not because AI. I just reviewed a PR by a newb. Code was fine. I could reason about what they did. It worked correctly. Then I read the other devs comments and what they requested done and now code that worked correctly and was easy to reason about is buried in abstraction that isn’t really needed but it “makes the code much better”. No it doesn’t.

That’s what I’m sick of. If I’m reading code and the logic that actually does something is buried that irritates me.

Some abstraction is great. Otherwise we would program with physical switches. But abstraction just because you think it makes the code look better is shit.

[–] Qwel@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I recently had to work without an IDE on some code made by a *thunder crack* Java Senior. There was 4 redirections in 3 different files for something that, hopefully, got inlined at compile time. I swear it gets worse with age.

[–] nycvin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I'm pretty sure "sick of Java abstractions" was one of the motivations behind Golang.