this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2026
373 points (89.8% liked)

Late Stage Capitalism

2944 readers
197 users here now

A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.

A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.

RULES:

1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.

2 No Trolling

3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, or liberalism, liberalism is in direct conflict with the left. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.

4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.

5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.

6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' Tankie, etc. This includes instance shaming.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 7 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (2 children)

VOTE BLUE NO MATTER WHO isn't working out.

Let's pretend somehow the R party disappeared tomorrow... a new party would be formed, and they would do they exact same thing for the Democrats.

Because it's a tag team. Each needs the other to blame their failures on (the failure always being "what the people want").

Some approximate percentages on "what the people want" according to repeated polls for decades: 70% of voters want higher minimum wage... 70% of voters want term limits for reps... 80% of voters want to end insider trading... 70% of voters want universal healthcare... 80% want the rich to pay taxes again... and so on. Use your favorite source.

It doesn't matter. Our choices in this political system are "anti-union secular capitalists" vs. "anti-union theocratic capitalists", and "what the people want" is not a voting option.

I vote every election, and I often vote Democrat. But I realize it's more like another poll than an actual route to political change or reform.

On the bright side, the banks are very happy! If they invest in absolute shit, the taxpayers will always be there to "bail them out", over and over and over and over and over again.

I wonder if that's connected to inflation and lower standards of living and shorter lifespans? Meh, whatever. STOCK MARKET 50K BABY

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

Trying to scare people off from voting with principle and warning of "splitting the votes" is a neoliberal propaganda. Canada and UK are also two-party systems, and yet they have third parties gaining seats. The now centre right British Labour Party tried to also do the same scaremongering in a by-election to dissuade voters from voting the Green Party, which took the torch of British leftism. And yet, the vote splitting didn't happen, and the Green Party won by a huge margin against the right wing Reform and Labour.

America could learn a lot, instead of listening to their mainstream media who brainwash their citizens of being corralled to think within an allowed narrative. I remember a Singaporean diplomat years ago, who made a comment that even though America is nominally a free country, he finds the news and discourse to be limited and insular-- which is practically the same as listening to state-run news in countries like China.

Although, this hasn't always been the case. One hundred years ago, third parties in America do get seats. I think the difference is that one hundred years ago, ordinary Americans were more politically proactive and engaged. One hundred years ago was the generation that ended the Gilded age and elected the Roosevelts. I don't know what happened but my suspicion is that after World War II, when the nation experienced enormous wealth and prosperity that previous generations never experienced before, Americans have become complacent.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca -2 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (3 children)

VOTE BLUE NO MATTER WHO isn't working out.

Only because people didn't. In a binary choice, fuckwits voted the worst choice. This was an intelligence test that America failed.

In identical news, evolution isn't immediate.

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

It's not working out because the system is not designed that way. It is only a binary choice for those that believe Democrats are different from Republicans, they are both shades of fascism that don't give a fuck about the working class

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Indeed, evolution is not immediate.

USA evolution happens to mean a lower standard of living, shorter lifespans, and exponential government waste, regardless of who is at the helm. So, a devolution.

If Ds won every election, they would still be unable to solve any of these issues, because they're not paid to do so. They're paid to do something else, instead.

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

Democrats have contributed to that failure with their vote blue no matter who approach, an approach that fails to hold them accountable for any of their actions, which is why we have Democrats that are barely to the left of first-term Trump