this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2026
355 points (99.7% liked)

Memes of Production

1348 readers
993 users here now

Seize the Memes of Production

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the “ML” influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.

Other Great Communities:

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] frisbird@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh, sweaty. Of course only you write out your own posts, everyone else copies and pastes their words. And of course everyone who argues against you a sophist, only you can cherry pick facts that make real arguments with substance. And of course you don't have to read what other people write, sweaty. Only your words deserve to be read and argued against. Anyone else, and especially someone who disagrees with you, is writing for their own benefit and you don't have to read it all. Just respond. I'm sure it'll be just as good that way. You're just so smart!

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Oh sweety, it's very easy to mince words and say nothing of substance when you're just spoon feeding. Still waiting for someone spoon feed you on what to say about 9-6 schedule and the fact that China produced more billionaires than US? How is all this still in line with communism?

[–] frisbird@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

say nothing of substance

🪞 Talking to yourself, I see. 🪞

https://www.china-briefing.com/news/996-is-ruled-illegal-understanding-chinas-changing-labor-system/

The 996 schedule is illegal under Chinese labor law and has been for years. It went up to the court system and the legislative system and the workers in every case were supported in their labor claims.

As for billionaires, I've said this before in other comments, I'll say it again here - The communist revolution in China was very explicit about its collaboration with the national bourgeoisie. It's quite open about it, as communists do not hide their intentions and speak openly about their strategy. The Chinese strategy was experimental, drawing from the failures of past revolutions and developing a theory based on them, it implemented an experiment of cross-class collaboration while maintaining a dictatorship of the proletariat. Creating on-paper billionaires is easy when you have a stock market and you've opened it up to Western speculators. In fact, if you're doing it right, you're guaranteed to get billionaires. The question is not whether there are billionaires but whether the state is promoting the interests of the proletariat. Billionaires are a side show.

The 100-million-member CPC is predominantly farmers and blue collar workers. The party is constantly punishing the rich for corruption. They've literally executed the rich for harming the masses through negligence and profit-seeking.

Billionaires are not contradictory with the process of building communism. Billionaires will be impossible under communism since there won't be money. The process of building socialism is what we're all currently working through as a species.