I literally posted the same suggestion in this community three days ago as a joke!
this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2026
152 points (99.4% liked)
NonCredibleDefense
600 readers
260 users here now
Militaria shitposting central! Post memes, tasteless jokes, and sexual cravings for military equipment and/or nuclear self-destruction!
Rules:
- Posts must abide by Piefed.social terms and conditions
- No racism or other bigotry allowed.
- Obviously nothing illegal.
If you see these please report them.
Related communities:
!forgottenweapons@lemmy.world
For the other, slightly less political NCD, !noncredibledefense@sh.itjust.works
founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Well, bombs are MUCH bigger now. Of course, using fewer larger bombs creates MUCH more ejecta than more smaller bombs.
That's true, but crater width doesn't scale linearly with bomb yield so I don't think you could get it down to a dozen even with the largest bombs we have available today.
That's true. But that's very much the least of the problems with this moronic idea. Newt would give zero fucks about making it 1200 bombs instead of 12.