this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2026
47 points (86.2% liked)

Frugal

5989 readers
187 users here now

Discuss how to save money.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The one I'm drinking right now is 6.76€ and the cheapest one is 1.28€.

First of all - what a price difference. Secondly, it's actually not bad. It does have that faint "cheap coffee" taste, but after a few cups I barely notice it anymore.

The real question is: is the tradeoff worth it? Do I give up a few percent of enjoyment on every single cup just to save the equivalent of a month's grocery bill yearly? I'm not in any dire financial spot - frugality is basically a hobby/lifestyle for me at this point - but it's getting rarer and rarer to find ways to pocket savings of this level anymore.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] manualoverride@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

How are you buying/making your coffee? I switched from good quality instant to good quality beans and halved the price per month and got much better coffee in the process.

I did need a grinder and an espresso machine which consumed the first years savings, but after that it was all crema and savings.

[–] Janx@piefed.social 9 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

I'd like to point out that you do not need to buy an espresso machine to enjoy good coffee. An Aeropress, a Chemex, a french press, a v60 pourover, or even a drip machine, with burr grinder can produce amazing coffee...

[–] manualoverride@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

I have an AeroPress for camping, love it but it’s more of a faf than I like, I really don’t like single use filters if I can help it, and so far the stainless mesh filter has not produced any good coffee so I’m back on the paper.

One thing I did consider is energy use, I still have to boil a kettle, with enough water to not have limescale in the pour-off (hard-water area) I wonder how much power this would use in comparison to my Espresso machine.

Have to say an AeroPress is not so cheap here at ~£35 compared to my ~£70 basic espresso machine.

[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

but you do need an espresso maker to make espresso, which still tastes better than the coffee pour overs or drip machines can produce 😅

but you can also buy a bare-bones, manual press-lever espresso maker for much cheaper - it's smaller, easier to maintain, has no electronic parts

[–] Janx@piefed.social 5 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

espresso, which still tastes better than the coffee pour overs or drip machines can produce

Ah, there's the bias. Espresso is just concentrated coffee made with pressurized water, it's not a different level in quality. You can make bad espresso just like you can make amazing Aeropress, french press, pourover, and yes: drip coffee. You're perfectly allowed to prefer that style of coffee, but even the experts agree: it's not automatically better than other types.

[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

oh, of course - sorry, I don't mean to imply there is no such thing as bad espresso, or no such thing as good french press coffee, or that all bad espresso is better than all good french press, etc.

but I will say that each method has its particular benefits and downsides

no other method creates the crema and concentrated flavor espresso makes

but neither espresso nor french press are particularly stable, so if you want coffee that doesn't quickly become bitter (e.g. when you make coffee in an office and want to be able to drink a few cups over a few hours), making a pot of drip coffee makes more sense, because drip coffee is more stable and has fewer free-floating coffee grounds that continue to leach astringent chemicals.

So, you're right - it's entirely a matter of taste, purpose, and context - not everyone even enjoys good espresso.

But I personally still think it doesn't get better than the way espresso tastes so rich and creamy - it does feel like the highest / best form of coffee to me.

[–] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

For those thinking about it, I picked up a second hand Rancilio Silvia (model 2 I think) for like $150 (more now, people have cottoned on) like 12 years ago and they are real BIFL. The frame eventually rusted (should have painted) so I replaced it with stainless last year, you can still get all the parts from the manufacturer, there's even fan made temperature / pressure add-ons or better pumps if you want. So worth it.

[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 19 hours ago

that's awesome! I didn't make espresso for the longest time because I didn't want a big, expensive machine that had too many bells and whistles.

What I ended up going with was a brand new Flair manual lever espresso maker, which incidentally also only costs $150, and I've made excellent espresso with it so far.

[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I have a drip machine and I buy pre-ground beans. I have a grinder too but don't find grinding my own being any cheaper. It does usually improve the taste though.

[–] manualoverride@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

In that case you are probably making it the cheapest possible way (excluding some catering grade freeze-dried coffee sold in bin bags) pre-ground is often cheaper than beans due to shipping cost, I take the ~10% increase cost, because I think I can make a self-grind taste at least 10% better. :)

[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Well, I do have a Moccamaster, which is a pretty decent brewer, but I'm not exactly a coffee snob. I just want a hot, coffee-tasting drink that's not awful.

If it was just a bit cheaper, I wouldn't even consider switching - but the price difference is almost five-fold.

[–] manualoverride@lemmy.world 1 points 22 minutes ago

Do it, but save the cash (actual coins and notes) and after 3 months, look at what you saved and decided if it’s worth it for you. Great frugal work, whatever you decide.