this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2026
542 points (99.5% liked)
Technology
82798 readers
3363 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
North America is Wikipedia's largest funding source by a factor of more than 2. I'm not sure why you're calling Americans out here.
Are you supposing that IA is better known in other countries than in the US? Are you basing that on anything?
Because the original comment (not made by me) was an appeal to Americans. The subsequent comment said it's not the [American] public. Thus I'm specifically limiting what I'm saying to Americans, regardless of the relative extent to which it applies elsewhere. Because that's whom the conversation – that I didn't start – is about.
The rest of the conversation, though, was about a (mostly) exclusively American thing, relating to lobbying and legislation against Wikipedia and IA. I've got no problem with shitting on the US for things we're actually doing, but saying the public doesn't support Wikipedia when we're actually the #1 supporter worldwide of Wikipedia feels kind of disingenuous.
Like I said, active support in hearts and minds – being ready and equipped to defend it if it comes under threat. Relatively, North America is the most supportive financially compared to the rest of the world. To the extent that's related to a bunch of factors, I'm not qualified to say (and I'll say I feel a fuck of a lot more qualified than most).
When I say that people take Wikipedia for granted, you can hopefully tell that I'm talking about it in the same way people often used to take basic executive branch norms for granted before Trump's terms. Not everyone did; people who were especially politically engaged probably didn't. Most people would've told you they supported them; an overwhelming majority of people who weren't far-right nutjobs would've. But they often treated them as "too big to fail", and they were blindsided as Trump destroyed them.