this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2026
41 points (87.3% liked)

Technology

82798 readers
3727 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
41
Why Are We Still Doing This? - Ed Zitron (www.wheresyoured.at)
submitted 1 day ago by compostgoblin@piefed.blahaj.zone to c/technology@lemmy.world
2 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WesternInfidels@feddit.online 7 points 13 hours ago

I am constantly asked to explain my opinions ... I am constantly harangued for proof of what I believe, and every time I hand it over there’s some sort of ham-fisted response of “it’s getting better” and “it will get even more better from here!’

For an industry so thoroughly steeped in cold, hard rationality , AI boosters are so quick to jump to flights of fancy — to speak of the mythical “AGI” and the supposed moment when everything gets cheaper and also powerful enough to be reliable or effective.

I don't know what's going to happen with "AI," but I think this highlights an interesting pattern, one where the standards of evidence for critics and boosters are different. Certainly we've seen a similar phenomenon in cryptocurrencies and NFTs.

Is it profound, is it one of those penetrating insights that you can't stop seeing once you've seen it? I'm not sure. Of course enthusiasts are biased, of course their arguments are emotional and unfair.