this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2026
24 points (87.5% liked)

Starfleet Headquarters

161 readers
151 users here now

Starfleet HQ

The Federations source for all Star Trek news, updates, and discussion.

Rule 1 — Be Civil, Not Klingon
Engage respectfully with fellow crew members.

  • No harassment, brigading, or trolling
  • No bigotry (racism, sexism, transphobia, etc.)
  • Disagreeing is fine, but personal attacks are not

Rule 2 — Stay On Topic
Posts should be related to Star Trek: news, updates, official announcements, or meaningful discussion.

  • Off-topic content may be removed
  • Memes should be quarantined under a level 5 containment field to !Risa@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Rule 3 — No Prohibited Content
Some things are not allowed aboard the ship.

  • No spam or scams
  • No illegal content
  • No porn or sexually explicit material
  • NSFW content must be properly tagged

Rule 4 — Gatekeeping Is Not Starfleet
You can have your opinions on what counts as “real” Star Trek, but forcing them on others is not allowed.

  • Everyone’s perspective is valid, TOS purists and Lower Decks fans alike
  • Keep debates about canon and quality friendly and inclusive

If you see a post breaking the rules, report it so the moderators can handle it. If you'd like to be a mod, shoot Stamets a message.

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Proof that review bombing apparently works

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What's wild to me is that it will get a whole second season and can turn opinions around. But nah, they're gonna cancel it now, but give it a whole ass new season... why? Why not just cancel it now? Makes no sense.

I mean, if you don't like it, why would you want/justify the second season? If you do like it, why would you want/justify the cancelation?

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Contractual obligations.

plus: they expect it to continue losing them money.

plus plus: oh and the show is now being produced by a soon to be immensely indebted corporate entity that's getting a massive management shake up.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/other/foreign-investments-in-paramount-warner-bros-deal-flagged-by-senators/ar-AA1Zf2Yb

The senators, in a letter to the FCC on Monday, called for a "full and independent" probe of the merger, citing concerns that financing from Middle Eastern sovereign wealth funds and Chinese gaming giant Tencent could give them influence over editorial decisions at CBS News and CNN.

"This constellation of foreign investment from China and from Gulf states, with complex and sometimes competing relationships with the United States, demands rigorous, not perfunctory, review," the letter reads.

Saudia Arabi's Public Investment Fund, the Qatar Investment Authority and Abud Dhabi Investment Authority are collectively providing roughly $24 billion in funds to help bankroll Paramount's bid for Warner Bros. Discovery, according to SEC filings. Oh neat!

Saudi blood money and possibly Tencent, the best owners anyone could ever ask for.

Good thing that consumers are just flush with money these days, and will certainly be eager to keep paying subscription fees.

And if anything with this goes wrong, well, the US Private Equity/Private Investment sector isn't like, going through a mass panic bankrun or anything like that, so there will definitely be a solid backup plan in case any of this funding turns out to be too fishy!

(/s)

[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The second season was approved in 2024, two fucking years before anyone saw episode 1 of SFA.

I just don't really understand how television production works, so maybe all this is normal, but it seems weird to me, a layman.

[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 20 hours ago

Yeah, it is weird. Each season should be approved or denied based on the strength and weakness of the season before it.