this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2026
380 points (72.3% liked)

linuxmemes

30786 readers
993 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack users for any reason. This includes using blanket terms, like "every user of thing".
  • Don't get baited into back-and-forth insults. We are not animals.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn, no politics, no trolling or ragebaiting.
  • Don't come looking for advice, this is not the right community.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, <loves/tolerates/hates> systemd, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  • 5. 🇬🇧 Language/язык/Sprache
  • This is primarily an English-speaking community. 🇬🇧🇦🇺🇺🇸
  • Comments written in other languages are allowed.
  • The substance of a post should be comprehensible for people who only speak English.
  • Titles and post bodies written in other languages will be allowed, but only as long as the above rule is observed.
  • 6. (NEW!) Regarding public figuresWe all have our opinions, and certain public figures can be divisive. Keep in mind that this is a community for memes and light-hearted fun, not for airing grievances or leveling accusations.
  • Keep discussions polite and free of disparagement.
  • We are never in possession of all of the facts. Defamatory comments will not be tolerated.
  • Discussions that get too heated will be locked and offending comments removed.
  •  

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't remove France.

    founded 2 years ago
    MODERATORS
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] Senal@programming.dev 1 points 4 days ago (3 children)

    Claiming that something is a fallacy doesn’t make it any less true. It’s a very lazy way of arguing.

    I agree completely, i've seen an example of this recently :

    It’s just a stupid “slippery slope” fear mongering.

    I also have a list of examples of things that are not fallacies, just poor debate skills:

    • Incorrect usage of a fallacy
    • moving goalposts
    • feigned ignorance
    • projection

    If i had to pick one though i'd probably go with the Invincible ignorance fallacy


    The real problem is that some countries are actively trying to de-anonymize internet users. Not all countries accused of it are actually doing it, not all laws that people say will do it actually have this goal and not every technology that makes it possible will for sure be used with this purpose.

    100% agree that this is a big problem, it's not the only one, but a big one.

    I'm expecting it to work on a multiplicative curve, exponential ? geometric?

    All of the bits from various places will add up and continue to accumulate momentum towards the goal.

    Going on wild chases after some silly PRs in systemd or digital IDs is not helping anyone. It just serves as a distraction and makes fighting the real threats more difficult.

    Which is again, not the point and also incorrect.

    Highlighting this as another example of the continuous creep towards end goal while explaining the increasing encroachment is incredibly useful for getting more eyes on the bigger picture.

    because.....the issue isn't the PR , but the intent behind it.

    If it was just about the PR itself in isolation, i'd agree with you.

    If anything, you trying to shut down the discussion around this "silly" PR is doing more to harm the general increase in awareness.

    [–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

    https://lemmy.nz/post/35765225

    And more comments about systemd but 0 talk about the legislation. So far I don't see any confirmation for you theory that talking about systemd helps promote this issue and fight the legislation.

    [–] Senal@programming.dev 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

    Highlighting this as another example of the continuous creep towards end goal while explaining the increasing encroachment is incredibly useful for getting more eyes on the bigger picture.

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    edit: changed emphasis

    [–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 1 points 3 days ago

    I get your point but all I see is still just people talking about slippery slopes and what they think will come next in very general terms. With Chat Control for example the discussion was a lot more concrete. He had information about very specific legislation and how it was progressing through the legislation and we had pressure campaigns on EU and national levels. It was so much different than complaining about some software complying with the law and how it should be resisting it instead. I simply think focusing so much on systemd is pointless and it's not helping with the issue at all.

    But at this point it's just my personal opinion and I might very well be wrong about it. I sure hope this will serve as some catalyst that will let people focus on the actual issue and fight it effectively. Right now I don't see any effective action, only distractions, but since I'm not doing anything useful regarding this either I should just let people do what they see fit. Even if it's just venting.

    [–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 1 points 4 days ago

    https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/65894673

    Just more comments about how they will force ID checks in the future. 0 discussion about actual legislation or any useful organizing.

    [–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 1 points 4 days ago

    Highlighting this as another example of the continuous creep towards end goal while explaining the increasing encroachment is incredibly useful for getting more eyes on the bigger picture.

    Hmmm.... maybe you're right. I will follow the comments more closely to see what part of them talks about fighting the actual legislation and what part just talks about abandoning systemd. My sensation so far was that people were focusing almost exclusively on forking the project and creating pointless alternative distros but maybe it was just my bias.

    I agree that if talking about systemd would serve to inform people about the legislation and abolish it (or prevent the next one) it would be actually useful. Recently we've seen couple of fairly successful actions like complaining about Android's developer verification to EU, complaining about planned backdoors in E2E encryption in EU or writing to EU about open source in general. All this was done before changes were actually enacted and in reaction to concrete proposals, not as weird attacks on unrelated projects after the law was already passed and complaining about some general and gradual "slippery slope" style attacks on privacy. But maybe the other tactic will also work. I guess we'll see.