this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2026
699 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

83102 readers
4982 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
699
Wikipedia has banned AI-generated text, with two exceptions (www.howtogeek.com)
submitted 3 days ago by corbin@infosec.pub to c/technology@lemmy.world
104 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Aatube@thriv.social 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_AI_Cleanup/Guide

[–] umbraroze@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 days ago

I was about to link to that, and specifically the stuff that now seems to have been moved to Signs of AI writing.

I thought that was a very interesting read, because it's so much better than the usual AI ragebait that led to people getting pilloried over the fact that they actually know how to use em dashes. You can't detect LLM use just by the fact that someone uses em dashes. It's a complicated stylistic issue that usually boils down to "well, you know what ChatGPT output looks like when you see it".

[–] amateurcrastinator@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Ok but surely there must be an automated way. You can't throw manpower at this because they will loose

[–] umbraroze@slrpnk.net 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There are no reliable automated LLM output detectors. Anyone who says otherwise is either trying to sell you snake oil (or is unwittingly helping someone to sell snake oil to someone else, I guess).

[–] amateurcrastinator@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

so the question still stands. how do they detect AI use? i am all for it btw. it is absolutely necessary but I am afraid it is impossible to do or implement.

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 days ago

I think they just try their best

[–] Aatube@thriv.social 1 points 2 days ago

actually the manual and volumetric https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Recent_changes_patrol is ridiculously good