this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2026
52 points (94.8% liked)

Selfhosted

56953 readers
579 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

  7. No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
Loki@lemmy.world
CannaVet@lemmy.world
devve@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz
52
What are some TrueNAS alternatives? (lemmy.zip)
submitted 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) by possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
44 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

In case you didn't hear TrueNAS is going partially closed source. However, there seems to be a lack of alternatives.

Any ideas on what to move to?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tofu@lemmy.nocturnal.garden 1 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

Does cockpit have proper UI for ZFS and NFS? That's the only reasons I'm using TrueNAS currently and I'm a bit annoyed with it generally.

[–] Owljfien@piefed.world 2 points 11 hours ago

Cockpit does through a separate module called cockpit-zfs but it doesn't quite have feature parity. There are some niche situations where you may need to use cli

[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Proxmox has a UI for ZFS. But you don't really need it, ZFS is kind of set and forget and setting it up is quite easy via CLI.

[–] tofu@lemmy.nocturnal.garden 1 points 10 hours ago

I know and I'm considering it, I'm already running Proxmox anyways. The connection between zfs, permissions and NFS is what I like in TrueNAS.

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Not for zfs. I mount zfs on proxmox. Why I don’t just run samba on proxmox, I’m not sure. There is some fuckery with permissions to make it work in a container and permissions are unnecessary for my use case.

But you don’t really need a ui for zfs. I ran it for 10 years on TrueNAS and only used it for initial setup.

[–] tofu@lemmy.nocturnal.garden 1 points 10 hours ago

I know and I'm considering it, I'm already running Proxmox anyways. The connection between zfs, permissions and NFS is what I like in TrueNAS.