Hardware

6773 readers

24 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.

Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Rules (Click to Expand):

Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about
Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.
No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.
Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.
Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).
If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

submitted 4 days ago by Rekall_Incorporated@piefed.social to c/hardware@lemmy.world

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Rekall_Incorporated@piefed.social 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I am assuming they are saying raster performance will be 30% to 35% higher than the 5000 series.

There is no way raster would be 35% of the performance of the 5000 series.

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

That makes much more sense haha, I was sure I must have been reading that wrong