this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2026
35 points (94.9% liked)

NASA

1502 readers
75 users here now

Anything related to the NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration); the latest news, events, current and future missions, and more.

Note: This community is an unofficial forum and is unaffiliated with NASA or the U.S. government.

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] vrek@programming.dev -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

They aren't "going to the moon" they are going around the moon. It's like saying "I'm going to the store" and just driving past the parking lot and turning around to go home.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 hours ago

Don't know why you are getting down voted. This is a massive amount of money for no obvious purpose.

No, there will not be a moon colony one day, just fucking no.

[–] ThunderQueen@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Its more like if you lived in the eastern hemisphere and were like "im going to the grand canyon" and only planned on driving by on your road trip.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

They're getting within 6500km of the surface, after travelling 385.000km. So they're going 98.3% of the way to the moon.

So that's like going from Beijing to the grand canyon, and staying in the western suburbs of Las Vegas.

[–] ThunderQueen@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

Right. For all intensive purposes, they went to the moon lmao

Agree. I also dislike the wording of all the news.