104
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee -3 points 1 year ago

Remember back when triple AAA games were released and didn't need to be patched immediately so you can play because the game devs actually decided to make a proper functioning game instead of going for greed?

[-] GreenMario@lemm.ee 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I lived it and fucking NOPE so many broken games. Check out AVGN or any Games Done Quick glitch speed run for many examples.

Games had less moving parts back then so they seemed like they worked, until you find out that there were entire spells that didn't work in Final Fantasy or how you can jump just right and enter a game breaking bug thay required a reset (SMB1 minus world). Or how uninstalling the game would uninstall Windows (Kohan? And Pools Of Radiance 2)

Plus now they can make patches in between the time they start pressing discs (gone gold) and release, hense the "day 1 patch". Personally I'm glad games can be fixed post release although I would prefer it to be more complete/fix at launch than usual.

Yeah, a mix of both would be ideal. The fact that we're surprised that Starfield and Baldur's Gate 3 were solid on release is a problem, all AAA releases should have that level of quality at a minimum on release.

If games are consistently solid at release, I'd probably preorder like I used to. Now I wait and see because, more often than not, it's a buggy mess the first few weeks.

[-] Virkkunen@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago

This seems to be an Intel issue rather than a Bethesda one

[-] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

It's a Bethesda game, when did they ever do that?

[-] orbitz@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

I remember those days as having no Internet let alone high speed, I recall reading old ads for some PC games. So they don't seem as great as you're implying because at least the game will most likely be fixed with an accessible patch these days. You'd have to do a lot more work to get one before or completely wasted your money in rare cases.

Also usually publishers set the release date, though in this case I'm not sure if it was in house or not so may not be a point, though you called out developers so figured I'd add it in.

[-] maltasoron@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah, scrounging gaming websites to find the right patch files could be a real pain in the ass, especially before Google.

this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2023
104 points (94.8% liked)

Games

16599 readers
955 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS