22

Stanford and Cal are expected to take reduced television revenue shares, while SMU will earn no television revenue from the league for approximately nine years.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

impressive level

They have recently done this. They were ranked as high as 15 in November a few years ago. They clearly showed potential (albeit for one year). Did it come crashing down? Yes, of course. But hey, they had those clean Dallas tribute unis and that makes up for it, right?

That was just before NIL. Now that programs can openly flaunt cash, who's going to stop them from returning to their Pony Excess ways?

this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2023
22 points (100.0% liked)

College Football

817 readers
20 users here now

A community to discuss college football.

Find your team's community

Join the Fanaticus Discord

Vote in the community poll

/c/CFB Poll Top 25 Fanaticus
1. Georgia Georgia
2. Texas Texas
3. ~~Notre Dame~~ Notre Dame
4. Ohio State Ohio State
5. Oregon Oregon
6. Miami Miami
7. Alabama Alabama
8. Oklahoma Oklahoma
9. USC USC
T-10. Ole Miss Mississippi
T-10. Penn State Penn State
12. ~~Michigan~~ Michigan
13. Tennessee Tennessee
T-14. Missouri Missouri
T-14. Utah Utah
16. Oklahoma State Oklahoma State
T-17. ~~Georgia Tech~~ Georgia Tech
T-17. ~~Kansas~~ Kansas
19. LSU Louisiana State
T-20. Florida State Florida State
T-20. Kansas State Kansas State
T-20. Louisville Louisville
T-20. ~~SMU~~ SMU
T-24. Boston College Boston College
T-24. ~~Iowa~~ Iowa

Check out our other sports communities!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS