36
submitted 11 months ago by lemmus@lemmy.world to c/uk_politics@feddit.uk

The U.K.'s Shadow Chancellor, Rachel Reeves, has won plaudits from an unlikely source for taking a tough line on taxation after she pledged that the Labour Party would not introduce a wealth tax if it forms a government following the next British election.

U.S. Senator Chuck Grassley, a Republican from Iowa, said in a post on social media on Friday that America's Democratic Party should "wake up and take a cue" from Reeves.

"She is for wealth creation. She feels u don’t tax ur way out [of economic problems]. U grow ur way out," he wrote, adding that the British opposition's policies are "very Reaganesque."

In an interview with the Telegraph last weekend, Reeves ruled out introducing a levy on accumulated wealth or owned properties despite calls from some on the left of the party to back more radical solutions to the cost of living crisis.

She also confirmed a decision to shelve plans to raise the top rate of personal income tax from 45 pence on the pound, as Labour shifts onto a campaign footing ahead of parliamentary elections expected next year.

The move, which Reeves said she hopes will ensure support from wealthier voters and secure investment from business, has drawn ire from supporters of former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn. Left-wing pressure group Momentum described the policy shift as "shameful" and “a political choice to favour big business and the 1 percent over ordinary people.”

Grassley, an 89-year-old conservative Republican, has consistently opposed higher taxation in the U.S. and pushed for repealing the estate tax on inherited assets, as well as backed looser gun-control laws and states' rights to ban abortions.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Syldon@feddit.uk 5 points 11 months ago

Media reform is in the interests of Labour. I could see this one changing in the next parliament, but we will have to wait and see. As has been well reported, Starmer met with Murdoch. If he panders to the Murdoch narrative then that is an extremely bad sign for UK politics. FPTP has produced a gravy train, and money follows money where ever it may go. It will be an uphill battle.

this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2023
36 points (97.4% liked)

UK Politics

2966 readers
59 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS