this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2023
43 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

39739 readers
363 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Some of the planned blackouts will be temporary, others plan to shut their subreddits down indefinitely in protest.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] OneFluffyBoi@octodon.social 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

@argv_minus_one Is that scaling problem a software issue, or a hosting issue? There are other Fediverse platforms like Akkoma that use Elixir, so maybe they'd fair better? Could also pick several federated instances to distribute users to.

[–] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Lemmy is written in async Rust. The language isn't going to create a scaling problem. Well-written async Rust applications have handled vastly heavier workloads than Lemmy without a hitch.

There are, however, some serious performance bottlenecks that need to be dealt with, and it remains to be seen whether any more bottlenecks remain undiscovered in either the protocol or the implementation. To be honest, as someone working on a Rust+Postgres application myself, this is the sort of thing that keeps me up at night.

Hosting can of course be an issue as well. I'm under the impression that Beehaw had to go up several tiers in its hosting plan in the last few days in response to the surge in demand. I assume this was done to work around the aforementioned bottlenecks by simply throwing more hardware at the problem, but I don't know.

[–] OneFluffyBoi@octodon.social 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

@argv_minus_one I see. The more I look into it, the more I think Lemmy should still be considered beta software like kbin, TBH. Some important features are still missing and the optimization is lacking.

[–] ericjmorey@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago

I do consider Lemmy to be beta software.

But it's currently the best option.