1585
Make it make sense (i.imgur.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] MooseBoys@lemmy.world 46 points 1 year ago

The difference is that when you say “I can’t pay my employees more” most employees begrudgingly accept the pay they get anyway. But when someone says “I can’t pay my rent”, the landlord evicts them.

If not paying your employees more actually resulted in having no employees, they would be equivalent. The only practical way to make that happen is unionization.

[-] Angry_Maple@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 year ago

It's bizarre seeing that disconnect in real life.

At my last job, the wages were stagnant for years. The company held meetings to boast that they were making record profits, the highest increase yet. The following month, they refused to raise wages because it would be too expensive.

Somehow, they were shocked when practically everyone who was skilled left. They couldn't get new people in the door, either.

They ended up having to raise everyone's wages. (YAY union!)

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You're so close to hitting the fundamental truth here.

A landlord evicts someone who cannot pay rent because there are other people who can pay rent.

Employees leave if an employer pays too low if there are other, better-paying options available.

As there are typically, though not always, more available workers than available jobs at a given pay rate, the workers lack the employer demand necessary to set pricing wholesale.

The reason wages have been rising lately is because employers have been unable to find workers at previous salaries. There are most definitely businesses that have folded because of this - the business model for those companies did not account for higher wages, and raising prices was not possible in the interim.

That's the actual interplay between these market forces, and yes, the reason that unionization is effective (and often necessary) in raising wages. It's why collective bargaining is an essential control on labor markets

[-] vacuumflower 4 points 1 year ago

Correct. In one example the tenants are against the actual contract they need more than the landlord. In another it's the other way around with business owners and employees.

It's about negotiating power. Life isn't perfect. Everybody has their own idea of humanism, fairness etc (albeit often similar to many other people). From that point to synchronize you either walk away, negotiate or use violence. The latter should cause immediate removal of the initiator from the society, though that doesn't happen IRL - IRL that initiator is sometimes rewarded by various cockroaches. Walking away or negotiating is what normal humans in general do with varying results.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

They accept it because what else can they do? A lot of them aren't in unions and even if all of them quit, how are they going to find new jobs?

[-] Signtist@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

The thing is that it hurts the employer just as much as the workers if everyone quits, so if you unionize first, then threaten to stop working, then you've got someone who can negotiate with the employer so that you don't have to quit and you get paid enough to not make you want to quit.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

At my job, and I am looking for work elsewhere, you had to sign an employment contract saying you wouldn't unionize. That doesn't sound legal, but this is Indiana, so it probably is. If you want to know why I signed, I was desperate for a job.

[-] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

It's illegal. Every worker has the right by National Labor Relations Act.

As said above, not a legal clause. So signing it is the smart thing to do -- you can just ignore it and unionize anyway if you want.

[-] 20hzservers@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It's nice that they get written consent to fuck their employees at least.

If the corporations are making record profits, that means theyre hiring, it means you can go work for a rival.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I'm looking. The problem is I have sort of a weird and eclectic resume, which doesn't look great to employers.

[-] unfreeradical@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Both wages and prices are those most advantageous to the owning class as most oppressive to the working class.

The purpose of the post is to challenge the austerity narrative, of the immiseration of the working class being natural or necessary, more than simply desired by the greed of the owning class.

this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2023
1585 points (97.6% liked)

Antiwork

3562 readers
1 users here now

A community for those who want to end work, are curious about ending work, want to get the most out of a work-free life, want more information on anti-work ideas and want personal help with their own jobs/work-related struggles.

The new place for c/antiwork@lemmy.fmhy.ml

This server is no longer working, and we had to move.

Active stats from all instances

Subscribers: 2.1k

Date Created: June 21, 2023

Library copied from reddit:
The Anti-Work Library 📚
Essential Reads

Start here! These are probably the most talked-about essays on the topic.

c/Antiwork Rules

Tap or click to expand

1. Server Main Rules

The main rules of the server will be enforced stringently. https://lemmy.world/

2. No spam or reposts + limit off topic comments

Spamming posts will be removed. Reposts will be removed with the exception of a repost becoming the main hub for discussion on that topic.

Off topic comments that do not pertain to the post at hand may be removed if it is deemed they contribute nothing and/or foster hostility at users. This mostly applies to political and religious debate, but can be applied to other things at the mod’s discretion.

3. Post must have Antiwork/ Work Reform explicitly involved

Post must have Antiwork/Work Reform explicitly involved in some capacity. This can be talking about antiwork, work reform, laws, and ext.

4. Educate don’t attack

No mocking, demeaning, flamebaiting, purposeful antagonizing, trolling, hateful language, false accusation or allegation, or backseat moderating is allowed. Don’t resort to ad hominem attacks against another user or insult other people, examples of violations would be going after the person rather than the stance they take.

If we feel the comment is uncalled for we will remove it. Stay civil and there won’t be problems.

5. No Advertising

Under no circumstance are you allowed to promote or advertise any product or service

6. No factually misleading informationContent that makes claims or implications that can be proven false or misleading will be removed.

7. Headlines

If the title of the post isn’t an original title of the article then the first thing in the body of the post should be an original title written in this format “Original title: {title here}”.

8. Staff Discretion

Staff can take disciplinary action on offenses not listed in the rules when a community member's actions or general conduct creates a negative experience for another player and/or the community.

It is impossible to list every example or variation of the rules. It is also impossible to word everything perfectly. Players are expected to understand the intent of the rules and not attempt to "toe the line" or use loopholes to get around the intent of the rule.


Other Communities

c/workreform@lemmy.world


Server status for big servers http://lemmy-status.org/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS