287
submitted 11 months ago by Lianrepl@kbin.social to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Specifically thinking of stuff that make your life better in the long run but all kinds of answers are welcome!

I've recently learnt about lifetraps and it's made a huge positive impact on how I view myself and my relationships

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] turbonewbe@lemm.ee 70 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Unless you are wealthy, if you think life is to expensive you should ask for more taxes, not less.

The issue is not your net income, but wealth redistribution and solidarity.

[-] aesopjah@lemm.ee 18 points 11 months ago

Except for the part where they just make more tanks instead of give people insulin or whatever

[-] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 10 points 11 months ago

If you can, move to a first world country.

If not: revolution.

[-] freewheel@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

The United States is a first world country, and the parent comment applies here as well.

[-] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 2 points 11 months ago

That was the not-so-subtle dig at the bullshit the people of the USA put up with.

Only the rich get the benefit of the country's wealth and power.

[-] freagle@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 11 months ago

Taxes are completely fucked. Here's why.

ALL of the wealth of a society is produced by workers - they do the mining, the harvesting, the planting, the refining, the quality assurance, the distribution, literally ALL value is produced by the workers.

The owners got togther and formed a country. Not the workers, not "the people", only owners formed and organized the country. They chose a private property regime because they now own all the wealth produced by workers. 100% of what workers produce under an employment regime is owned by the owners.

But the owners can't sell anything if the workers can't buy it. And the workers can't work unless they can support their needs. So the owners take a portion of that value they steal and give it to the workers.

Then, the government that the owners created take money from the workers in the form of income tax, sales tax, and property tax.

Then they create NGOs and spend billions of dollars (that they stole from workers, remember) to convince workers to DONATE their salaries to the NGOs to solve social ills created by the owners.

Then the owners use the government to maintain their own wealth structures and prevent the workers from threatening them. When the owners make mistakes that would cost them fortunes, they take the money from the workers taxes.

Then they realized that even with this scheme workers were able to buy and own things. So they used their government to change the rules again. Fractional reserve banking let's a bank hold 100 dollars in cash and create 900 in loans. The bank loans this magical money to workers and the workers collateralize it by giving the bank on lien on their house. The bank now has a more collateral that they can use to generate 9x loan values from, and the act of generating that money causes price inflation in housing, which increases the amount of money the banks can loan out. The net result is that workers pay rent to live in their own homes and that rent goes to the owners who control the government. When this scheme runs into issues, the owners use money taken from the workers (a portion of what was given to them after everything was stolen from them) to smooth out any hiccups and keep the scam rolling.

So, no, taxes don't make things better. Only completely dismantling capitalism and running the government for workers by workers and eliminating private property and profit will ever help the 99%. Everything else is a scam and a distraction.

[-] deathbird@mander.xyz 5 points 11 months ago

Taxes can be a tool for taking unjustly gained capital and redistributing it to the people as a whole.

That does require workers exerting power through and over the state, but taxes are simply an exercise of power towards redistribution of resources.

[-] freagle@lemmygrad.ml -4 points 11 months ago

Not really though. The workers don't control the state, the owners do. The workers can't actually use the state to advance their interests. Every concession given to them by the owners is a) only given if the alternative is revolution and b) rolled back as soon as possible. Once the workers take over the state, taxes no longer serve that purpose but instead serve the purpose of smoothing out the money supply to avoid hoarding and accumulation.

Yes, in theory it would be great if we could tax the rich, but history shows us that we cannot, and ultimately theory has shown us the same thing.

this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2023
287 points (98.6% liked)

Asklemmy

43027 readers
1419 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS