Lawyers submitted bogus case law created by ChatGPT. A judge fined them $5,000. (apnews.com)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Wilshire@lemmy.ml to c/chatgpt@lemmy.ml

8 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] vis4valentine@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 year ago

This is disbarment worthy

[-] phosphorik@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

Seriously. Only 5k? After doubling down on the lie? They should never work in law again.

[-] onepinksheep@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

If it was intentional and they knew it was bogus, sure. But without looking at the details, I'm guessing they asked ChatGPT for case references and didn't fact check their results. Negligent, yes, but apparently not to the level to require disbarment.

[-] PizzasDontWearCapes@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

See the video linked above.

The initial use of ChatGPT was negligent, but they subsequently attempted to cover up what they did and lied to the judge, so, pretty terrible overall

this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2023

79 points (98.8% liked)

ChatGPT

1482 readers

1 users here now

A community to discuss about ChatGPT and AI. Not affiliated with OpenAI.

Rules:

NSFW must be marked as such
No porn
Don't be toxic
jailbreaks are allowed for now at least
No trashposts.
Keep the memes to a minimum

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

GoldenDoge@lemmy.ml

SeeleLowe@lemmy.ml

Senseibull@lemmy.ml