view the rest of the comments
World News
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
Ok so I read some more and I can't claim to understand your goals, Mr./Ms. "Can’t get canceled for saying dumb things on the Internet if I’m not verified."
I feel absolutely silly for continuing to read posts and comments, the IMDB page, and googling and finding little snippets of rumors about ADHD, DIY interest, apparently hosting some scientific & technical awards, not a trace on Twitter or Insta, except fan pages..? And a thing for letters?
Is this... plausible? Are you Among Us?
Surely not. Right? No.
Would a copycat write about New Sincerity? Who even knows about that? I've never heard it in normal internet discourse. It strikes me that this confused comment I'm writing seems to be quite aligned with the concept, unless I misunderstood it.
I'll let you be mate, I'm confused about your goals and your commitment. I'm still settling on this being a novelty account by some weird, uncharacteristically funny nerd and impersonator. Maybe with the primary intention of promoting Lemmy activity and prompting comment activity, you seem to be a fairly popular account.
Read some Infinite Jest for more info on New Sincerity. It's a pretty difficult read, but it's rewarding. Funny, too.
I thought there is at least someone here who would connect the dots realize that the movie isn't mainly about feminism, it's about New Sincerity, and so are many of the comments and posts from here before. A bit disappointed.
Maybe I just like talking to Internet weirdos. I try to be nice here. Usually.
Jokes aren't as funny if you explain them. It's not the right time for the punchline yet.
I might end up reading a book again when ebooks get the library treatment for real, but at least I saved a link to it in my bookmark folder for books? So that's something. Sits there along with Herodotus' Histories now, and 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea. The first one of those has been free to read since I added it, so my first sentence might be a bit bullshit. Or maybe old free books tend to be difficult reads too, and I really could get into reading something. Maybe one of Hank Green's books.
Is it weird that I get disheartened by the concept "You can read this book for free, but only if we physically send it to your library where you can retrieve it. We legally can't send you the ebook because that's not part of the deal. You'd have to get that one from Amazon or something."?
It feels like I'm in a library-limbo where I'm waiting for reason to catch up to reality.
Maybe I'll read it eventually, probably not. I'm about to try to go to space with Chris Roberts (new patch, maybe not broken?), then to sleep, and then forget about this whole interchange. Oh and I also had this thought that while I haven't read any of those books, neither Herodotus nor Plato have spent hours looking at Earth in VR, so that's a perspective they don't have. I see the disease that gives us good reason for nihilistic joy in our final centuries. Got em. So yeah I wasn't gonna include that part, but in the spirit of misunderstood new sincerity I'll include it. Have fun doing what you're doing, whoever you are.