489
submitted 11 months ago by mr_MADAFAKA@lemmy.ml to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] velovix@hedge.town 3 points 11 months ago

Don't Apple's chips have specific hardware support to make Rosetta 2 as effective as it is? I've been really hoping other manufacturers find a way to do something similar.

[-] quarterlife 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yes they do, and you can bet that'll go away as soon as Apple thinks x86 isn't important (to them).

[-] Petter1@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I don’t know about hardware support, but I found this article on box86.org which seems to be the best alternative to rosetta on Linux. The performance drop on box64 vs native is still much greater than the performance drop in rosetta:

https://box86.org/2022/03/box86-box64-vs-qemu-vs-fex-vs-rosetta2/

Edit: many infos about Rosetta under the hood: https://github.com/FFRI/ProjectChampollion

I found nothing, that implies that there would be specific hardware features in m1 for making the translation faster. Only that it does translation mainly ahead-of-time (AOT) and saves "that version" of the app somewhere as cache). I only scrolled through it and did not read it all, so maybe I missed it.

this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2023
489 points (93.6% liked)

linuxmemes

20363 readers
854 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS