56
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by rist097@lemmy.world to c/linkedinlunatics@sh.itjust.works
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Fosheze@lemmy.world 60 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

For those wondering like I was, mousewheels typically use optical or magnetic rotary encoders. However some do actually use potentiometers. I'm pretty sure the one pictured is an encoder though; all of the potentiometer based mousewheels I can find are way more bulky than that.

Edit: Damn it Lemmy. Fix your sorting so I'm not accidentally commenting on 4 day old posts.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

Honestly I kinda like the vibe of genuine necroing going on here. Is it a few hours old? A few days? 3 years? Who cares?

[-] Busy@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 year ago

I agree. Never understood why it was seen as a bad thing to respond to older comments or posts. Especially if you have something useful or good to contribute like the person above did.

[-] Skelectus@suppo.fi 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

On message boards it would bump old threads to top, which can be annoying. On reddit it was generally more ok, but many still had the idea that after some amount of time the discussion is "done". Lemmy has been pretty great in that regard.

[-] ArbiterXero@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Wait, some of them actually use potentiometers??

I’ve never seen that and that seems wildly stupid as a mechanism. Far too flawed in comparison to an optical wheel and sensor, and it’s not like the optical sensor is expensive,

this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2023
56 points (98.3% liked)

LinkedinLunatics

3210 readers
4 users here now

A place to post ridiculous posts from linkedIn.com

(Full transparency.. a mod for this sub happens to work there.. but that doesn't influence his moderation or laughter at a lot of posts.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS