75
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2023
75 points (77.0% liked)
Asklemmy
43752 readers
1898 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Am I reading this wrong, or is it more about preferential access to procurement deals than a straight-up transfer of wealth? I mean, that's good too, but obviously it hasn't made much of a dent in the inequality.
Yeah, corruption is definitely still a thing. In other democracies it gradually gets worked out over the decades. Once there's more than one party in play in SA I have no reason to think it won't work the same way.
Retransfer of wealth is how we end up with 1 trillion dollars being written on a bill
The correct country-code is ZA (Zuid-Afrika), Saudi Arabia has SA
I'm pretty sure I explicitly addressed Zimbabwe in OP. Leaving white people alone to hoard our looted colonial treasures is not a valid option.
I know someone who knows a farmer who, during the stupud zimbwabwe times, had his land redistributed. The land was used for nothing except selling it back later
Yeah, I know, that was also bad. To reiterate:
In Zimbabwe they forced the transfer all at once and there was no black people to take the stuff who could actually operate it, so it got sold off for parts. And then, of course, they tried to solve their economic woes by printing ever more money.
I'm guessing the middle road would be a 5% tax or something on the incomes of non-BEE businesses. That way, there would be no catastrophic transition, but with any luck BEE-compliant businesses would grow at a steady pace, and eventually I could actually walk around outside gated neighborhoods without worrying about vigilante redistribution.
I have family over there, but I've never been, so I guess I should end by saying this is just armchair general-ing. Obviously I don't get a vote.