Is it not? What would you call it? It doesn't even end at the Canadian border, really, although we start calling it "prairies" to be distinct.
Source: Live here, have seen that border.
Is it not? What would you call it? It doesn't even end at the Canadian border, really, although we start calling it "prairies" to be distinct.
Source: Live here, have seen that border.
Finland is also facing an adversary that's been a bit more strategic, and took some very hard political concessions during the Cold War in order to remain a separate country. And now they've joined NATO anyway.
I mean, sure, Finland-style mass mobilisation and fortress mentality is a great place to start. But, I don't see it replacing a nuclear umbrella, either our own or from someone who already has one.
To repeat from the deleted thread: on CUSMA goods, because the US quietly dropped the same on their end a week ago.
I'll let people decide for themselves if that's pitchfork-worthy.
What about the Twin Cities? They're also a major center, and in a "more" midwestern area in some sense, although Chicago is probably bigger.
To give them some credit, Americans know basic facts about their own geography, at least. Washington ends up with roughly the same favourability as Oregon here, and the two states do seem awfully similar.
Now, knowing that DC is actually full of ordinary, mostly black people, or that Montana isn't very different from North Dakota? Maybe not. That's beyond just map facts.
Generators, batteries, just a better grid. If it happened tomorrow it would be scary, but it will be gradual. Really poor people in vulnerable areas might not have the option to adapt, which I mentioned, but the average Lemming does.
Is dying your retirement plan or something? I'm not the one contradicting the experts here.
In classical statistical theory, manipulating a probabilistic state is equivalent to picking a single initial state with whatever probability, and then manipulating it. In quantum statistics it's provably not (at least if we're measuring particles with as much free will as we think); you need the whole thing for it to make sense. Two likely trajectories can interfere and cancel out, for example.
So, sure, a position is a vector. But we can only meaningfully talk about functions from a (measurable) set of vectors to their probability amplitude (which is like a probability, but complex). Or, in practice, the infinitesimal density of probability amplitude at that given point
The uncertainty principal is just one manifestation of that. And, like in the uncertainty principal, entanglement might not stay confined to just position if there's other parameters, so you really have to talk about functions on the whole state vector. I can't speak too much to quantum field theory, but the actual dynamics of basic quantum physics is about (very "basic") functions on those functions.
Is this calculated by assuming the wavefunction is static? Like, maybe a steady-state eigenfunction of the system's evolution with an eigenvalue that's 1, or another root of unity.
Yeah, in practice this is interpreted as as everyone must join to retaliate, except maybe in niche cases like the aggressor also being in NATO.
What is the user count vs reddit?
I'm not sure instances actually publish their user counts. You can measure by activity, which adds up to maybe 10 events a second. If you could figure out the average rate per user you could get an estimate from that.
Specifically, having listened to the conference, on CUSMA goods, because the US quietly dropped the same on their end a week ago.
It's not elbows up exactly, but it's not as crazy as it sounds at first.
Interesting. Do you have some examples?
Writing those frequently-called leaf functions in assembly has certainly far outlived it's use in other places. But, the word on the street, or I guess the conventional wisdom, is that compilers have gradually caught up even there.