CanadaPlus

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] CanadaPlus 4 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Hmm. Before the end of the 19th century you're going to run into non-standardised/completely bespoke parts problems. How are you on a lathe, or doing blacksmith work? Hot riveting was a separate trade which you wouldn't have to do, at least.

I'm kinda obsessed with what I call technological bootstrapping, and so I have useful book knowledge about every step along the way. Doing it in practice is another thing, though; the locals are going to run circles around me unless I can invent stuff. (And even that rule aside, not starving or being "disturbed" while I work on whatever project is a thing)

So, I think I have to echo the "it's not going great in 2025" answer.

[–] CanadaPlus 8 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (2 children)

It's a different time, probably normal civilian chips to hitch onto the massive industry that now exists. Kind of like how I'd guess the F-14 airframe was made of normal metal instead of something new they invented.

The radar and EWAR-related hardware, on the other hand, might not just be off the shelf.

[–] CanadaPlus 9 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

OP did say:

Even then, it’s a moving target when the end user is determined enough.

[–] CanadaPlus 1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Yeah, but they were talking about building out WhatsApp third party compatibility on top of it.

There already was Element One, which bridged to a bunch of things for a small subscription fee, although it had to break E2EE to do so. I'm just finding a lot of broken links now, though.

[–] CanadaPlus 3 points 18 hours ago

If it's the part I'm guessing it is, it was an accidentally successful interview, too, haha.

[–] CanadaPlus 3 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Eh, depends what you mean by isolated. I've had weird incidents with otherwise fine people. And I've definitely ended up doing things that were hard to explain for whatever reason. I'm guessing the brother is generally problematic, though, because that was multiple consecutive decisions driven by thinly-masked cruelty.

[–] CanadaPlus 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I'm not sure what you mean. Try again in a week or two?

I did detect that this was about the whole "LLMs ruin everything" jerk. The thing is, they're new, and misinfo has been around in other forms for a long time. It doesn't negate the things you do now - like talking to me, despite the fact we're probably in different countries - that would have been very hard in the 20th century, and impossible much before then. Relevant XKCD.

[–] CanadaPlus 6 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Okay, to be a bit glib, why don't you ask someone in real life? After all, it's all disinformation on here.

Sure, the information age comes with problems, but do consider what the world was like before. There were a lot of things people just didn't know and couldn't ever look up or ask about - unless they were motivated enough to dig through a library.

[–] CanadaPlus 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Too easy. It'd be like a bad GDPR window, where they make the interface as confusing, slow and painful as possible to deter you.

[–] CanadaPlus 1 points 1 day ago

They say, on RoughRomanMemes.

One of us, one of us...

[–] CanadaPlus 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Wow, I'm surprised they got it up that high in a practical application.

[–] CanadaPlus 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

They let OpenWhisper do the underlying protocol, so it's solid. Beats the shit out of a plain text message anyway, and people IRL might actually have it.

11
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by CanadaPlus to c/retrocomputing
 

Modern formulations are proprietary and almost certainly require a cleanroom, but the basic concept has existed for a century. I'd assume there's a history out there beyond what little Wikipedia offers.

Would I be able to DIY a tape that could store tens of megabytes of data, at least?

Edit: This adjacent wiki might have more to say on it, based on the reply I got. I assume digital data amounts to a much higher frequency of recording, though.

I do know audio cassette tapes were used repurposed for digital storage in the early PC era. Was there a noticeable difference based on quality and type of tape?

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/41849856

If an LLM can't be trusted with a fast food order, I can't imagine what it is reliable enough for. I really was expecting this was the easy use case for the things.

It sounds like most orders still worked, so I guess we'll see if other chains come to the same conclusion.

 

If an LLM can't be trusted with a fast food order, I can't imagine what it is reliable enough for. I really was expecting this was the easy use case for the things.

It sounds like most orders still worked, so I guess we'll see if other chains come to the same conclusion.

 

The awkward "nnnts nnts nnts" also made it pretty hard to tune out. And it got a sequel, which is actually fine because they're playing that now instead.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/37414239

I've read the old papers proving that fact, but honestly it seems like some of the terminology and notation has changed since the 70's, and I roundly can't make heads or tails of it. The other sources I can find are in textbooks that I don't own.

Ideally, what I'm hoping for is a segment of pseudocode or some modern language that generates an n-character string from some kind of seed, which then cannot be recognised in linear time.

It's of interest to me just because, coming from other areas of math where inverting a bijective function is routine, it's highly unintuitive that you provably can't sometimes in complexity theory.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/37414239

I've read the old papers proving that fact, but honestly it seems like some of the terminology and notation has changed since the 70's, and I roundly can't make heads or tails of it. The other sources I can find are in textbooks that I don't own.

Ideally, what I'm hoping for is a segment of pseudocode or some modern language that generates an n-character string from some kind of seed, which then cannot be recognised in linear time.

It's of interest to me just because, coming from other areas of math where inverting a bijective function is routine, it's highly unintuitive that you provably can't sometimes in complexity theory.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/37414239

I've read the old papers proving that fact, but honestly it seems like some of the terminology and notation has changed since the 70's, and I roundly can't make heads or tails of it. The other sources I can find are in textbooks that I don't own.

Ideally, what I'm hoping for is a segment of pseudocode or some modern language that generates an n-character string from some kind of seed, which then cannot be recognised in linear time.

It's of interest to me just because, coming from other areas of math where inverting a bijective function is routine, it's highly unintuitive that you provably can't sometimes in complexity theory.

 

I've read the old papers proving that fact, but honestly it seems like some of the terminology and notation has changed since the 70's, and I roundly can't make heads or tails of it. The other sources I can find are in textbooks that I don't own.

Ideally, what I'm hoping for is a segment of pseudocode or some modern language that generates an n-character string from some kind of seed, which then cannot be recognised in linear time.

It's of interest to me just because, coming from other areas of math where inverting a bijective function is routine, it's highly unintuitive that you provably can't sometimes in complexity theory.

-6
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by CanadaPlus to c/polandball@lemmy.world
 

All the new art, I presume, is still over there.

 

Bluesky, which uses it, has been opened to federation now, and the standard basically just looks better than ActivityPub. Has anyone heard about a project to make a Lemmy-style "link aggregator" service on it?

view more: next ›