34
submitted 1 year ago by aranym@lemmy.name to c/technology@beehaw.org

AI programs such as TensorFlow, PyTorch, and Hugging Face Hub work well under their open source licenses. The new AI artifacts are another story. Datasets, models, weights, etc. don't fit squarely into the traditional copyright model. (OSI director) Maffulli argued that the tech community should devise something new that aligns better with our objectives, rather than relying on "hacks."

Specifically, open source licenses designed for software, Maffulli noted, might not be the best fit for AI artifacts. For instance, while MIT License's broad freedoms could potentially apply to a model, questions arise for more complex licenses like Apache or the GPL. Maffulli also addressed the challenges of applying open source principles to sensitive fields like healthcare, where regulations around data access pose unique hurdles.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] fruitywelsh@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

Does Creative Commons and the RAILS licenses not cover most of these models fairly? That is what I tend to see them under.

[-] emr 2 points 1 year ago

RAIL has its own problems-the use restrictions make it very different from normal open source models.

this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2023
34 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37750 readers
843 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS