Ehh it wouldn't do much. A b25 bomber actually hit the empire state building in 1945 and the building is still there. It's a much more robust structure than the wtc.

[–] Kuori@hexbear.net 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

huh, interesting! i did not know about that. admittedly, it sounds like a problem that could be solved by adding more plane to the equation

[–] HornyOnMain@hexbear.net 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

second-plane "a fifteenth plane has hit the empire states building, it still hasn't fallen over yet"

[–] Kuori@hexbear.net 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

i'm picturing this comedy of errors style, with dozens of saudi grandmas lining up outside cockpits to take over and try their shot at IRL jenga

[–] ComradeChairmanKGB@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 2 years ago

Based matriarchs

[–] trot@hexbear.net 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Wouldn't a modern passenger jet have a much greater impact than a B25? The latter is several times lighter.

[–] emizeko@hexbear.net 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

and carries significantly more fuel (heavier, like 5-6x the range)