52
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] crawley@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Third party will never ever happen with the electoral college. Whichever party forms a third party and said third party will both lose 100% of the time.

[-] morrowind@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

I think Yang had it right by changing the voting system entirely

[-] Haui@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago

Isn’t it funny that even politics is duopoly in the US?

[-] FireTower@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

The electoral college has less of an impact than fptp voting IMO. Ranked choice or Star voting would actually allow third party candidates to win local elections at least.

[-] Lemmylaugh@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

For a third party system, It’s not about losing it’s about making sure those other guys lose.

[-] TallonMetroid@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

It about making the guys who you hate least lose, ironically. Voting against the other guy is already baked into FPTP, so if you vote for a 3rd party you're voting against both the main parties. Except the party you hate the most would've already gotten your anti-vote anyway, so really you're just adding an anti-vote to the other party, which is adding a handicap to them that wasn't there before.

[-] spittingimage@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Proportional representation is the way to go.

this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023
52 points (93.3% liked)

Hacker News

2159 readers
1 users here now

A mirror of Hacker News' best submissions.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS