183

Has anyone else been reading linked articles more often on Lemmy? (lemmy.ca)

submitted 2 years ago by TeaEarlGrayHot@lemmy.ca to c/main@sh.itjust.works

38 comments fedilink hide all child comments

When mindlessly browsing Reddit, I found that I usually just jump directly to the comments, read a couple, and continue. Lemmy seems a bit more curated (read: smaller), and therefore it's easier to actually engage in discussions, which leads me to read the article, think critically about it, and respond (if I have something to say) in the comments--bigger is not always better!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] nsfwacc_burner@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 2 years ago

I think at this point there should be a LLM extension which does it quickly for you everytime you end up on an article.

[-] jadero@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago

I'm torn.

Yes, article summaries can be nice, and often demonstrate just how unnecessarily wordy the original is.

On the other hand, not needing to follow links to the original is at least part of what's killing original creators, especially journalists and their outlets. As much as we dislike ads, subscriptions, and requests for donations, those are what fund the sources we most cherish.

[-] mr_washee_washee@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

there are too much journalists. if they agree to consolidate into less numerous news outlets and share a universal pay to read platform (the same concept of flipboard), i would gladly pay/or allow ad playback. but they agreed to disagree, they now must bear the consequences.

this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2023

183 points (97.9% liked)

sh.itjust.works Main Community

7584 readers

3 users here now

Home of the sh.itjust.works instance.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

TheDude@sh.itjust.works

manifex@sh.itjust.works

biela@sh.itjust.works

imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works