319
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2023
319 points (97.6% liked)
politics
19244 readers
2171 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Umm. Well, she’s got her hand wrapped around a hard cock in front of children in public with her tits hanging out… so I’m not sure how accurate your opinion is.
Why do people keep saying this? This never happened.
They got touchy-feely over the clothes. That's it.
https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/84ac7aea-ab39-4325-866b-e4579501c0a1.png
She wasn't jerking him off. Her tits weren't out. There weren't even any children in her section. Yes, she acted like a teenager in a movie theater and her behavior was obnoxious enough without having to go around and completely make shit up. If they had been engaging in the activity you described on camera, they'd be taking a one way trip to the sex offender registry.
I’m guessing you didn’t see the video. Either way—she’s not a teenager. She’s an elected government lawmaker.
Yes, yes I did. I even posted a screenshot of the moment his hand was on her boob. None of what you said happened.
She did not have "his hard cock in her hand". She did not have her tits out. And there aren't even any children seated in the video footage at all. They felt each other up. That's it. Feel free to go through the video yourself and point to any moment where (a) her tits were out, (b) his dick was in her hand or (c) any children were even able to see that she was there, let alone what she was doing.
I'm not saying her behavior was appropriate by any stretch of the imagination, but there's a huge difference between "copping a quick feel" and "whipping your tits out in front of children while giving your boyfriend a handy."
Hey, you keep defending her, Republican slime. Oh sorry “centrist” 🙄
You keep accusing her of things she didn't do. Point to me in the video that you cited as evidence exactly where either she or he was exposed in any way. Point to where her tits were out, or his dick was in her hand. Point to a single child that is within visual distance of her. As you and everyone who keeps making these claims says, it's all caputred on video. So it should be piss-easy to point out exactly where in the video it happened.
Or do you just prefer making false accusations and slinging insults at anyone who dares to challenge you?
Slinging false accusations is wrong, helps nobody, and just gives the other side ammunition to be used against you. This also holds true when the target of those false allegations is someone you don't like.
Is it jerking off if she rubs his dick through his pants and he orgasms?
Is it jerking off if his dick is out and she rubs it but he doesn’t orgasm?
What is jerking off? What are tits? What is a public location? What are children? What is proximity? What is appropriate public behavior? What is indecent? So many questions, so little brain power.