448

Twitter influencer sentenced to seven months for trying to trick Clinton supporters into voting by text (abcnews.go.com)

submitted 1 year ago by deconstruct@lemm.ee to c/politics@lemmy.world

37 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Douglass Mackey, the social media influencer known as "Ricky Vaughn," was sentenced Wednesday to seven months in prison for falsely assuring supporters of Hillary Clinton they could cast their vote in the 2016 presidential election through text messages or social media posts.

Mackey was prosecuted under the Ku Klux Klan Act that was enacted during the Reconstruction era in response to efforts by the KKK to prevent recently emancepated Blacks from voting.

Mackey was 26 years old in 2015 when he began posting on Twitter under the pseudonym "Ricky Vaughn," amassing 51,000 followers on Twitter and ranking among the "most influential voices" posting about the 2016 presidential election, according to a list compiled by M.I.T.

Federal prosecutors in New York said Mackey was intent on originating hashtags designed to "cause as much chaos as possible" by creating "controversy ... for the sole purpose of disparaging Hillary Clinton."

At 5:30 p.m. on Nov. 1, 2016, Mackey published the first tweet that falsely announced that people could register their vote by texting on their phones, according to trial testimony. Additional tweets followed.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Oh he was "just trolling"?

Double the sentence. Immature twat.

[-] PopcornTin@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Memes are violence. End them at all costs.

[+] circuscritic@lemmy.ca -7 points 1 year ago

I bet you supported the Patriot Act.

[-] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

The patriot act has nothing about punishing dumbasses for being trolling twats. Try again.

[-] circuscritic@lemmy.ca -5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Unintended consequences. It's like you think I care about this one guy, I don't. I care about this NEW power and how it will absolutely be ABUSED by the next Republican DOJ.

ZERO proven victims.

So he's convicted on the NEW precedent that memes cause criminal harm, even if that harm can't be proven with a single victim.

Gee. Can't see how that could possibly go wrong.

You know what's not a protected class? Being trans.

Do you think a GOP attorney general might go after makers of pro-trans memes? What memes do you think President MTG or Boebert would send her attorney general after?

Or do you think this will only get used against "bad guy meme makers"?

[-] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Tampering with elections is illegal. How are you this dense?

[-] circuscritic@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Look, I'm sure this guy is a complete douche. But the DOJ just gained a whole lot more power by using a KKK era law to criminalize memes.

Illegal memes, and the DOJ was not even required to provide a single victim. Think about, or don't.

I bet you'd probably be happy if Jonathan Swift had been locked up as well. After all, cannibalism is illegal.

this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2023

448 points (98.3% liked)

politics

19233 readers

2175 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News