384
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by ad_on_is@lemmy.world to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

How can it possibly be, that an ISP, which I'm paying for gets to decid, which sites I'm allowed to have access to, and which not?

All the torrenting sites are restricted. I know, I can use VPN, and such... but I want to do it because of my privacy concerns and not because of some higher-up decided to bend over for the lobbying industry.

While on the other hand, if there's a data breach of a legit big-corp website (looking at you FB), I'm still able to access it, they get fined with a fraction of their revenue, and I'm still left empty-handed. What a hipocracy!!

What comes next? Are they gonna restrict me from using lemmy too, bc some lobbyist doesn't like the fact that it's a decentralized system which they have no control over?

Rant, over!

I didn't even know that my router was using my ISPs DNS, and that I can just ditch it, even though I'm running AdGuard (selfhosted)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] XTornado@lemmy.ml 46 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

No offense but if they can do that you have to blame your government not the ISP.... as those are the ones allowing this to happen.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 14 points 10 months ago

The government are the ones telling the ISPs to do it, not just allowing it.

[-] XTornado@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

In some cases yes, but I would say that is allowing it too... Idk... I don't see the need to nitpick but yeah.

[-] loudWaterEnjoyer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 months ago

The government is elected by people who care or don't care about certain topics

[-] RogueBanana@lemmy.zip 3 points 10 months ago

The only choice he have here are stupid people and tech illiterate ones. Not a lot we can do except face palm at the ridiculously stupid solutions they come up with.

[-] nephs@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

As if the government wasn't controlled by probate lobbyists.

Blame goes to private interests being allowed to influence public decision makers, in my opinion. Infrastructure companies should not be for-profit companies.

[-] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 5 points 10 months ago

Those companies choose to do so as well.

[-] tonyn@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 10 months ago

Companies will do whatever legal measure makes them the most money.

[-] XTornado@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago

Yeah... But if there were laws that prohibited it they couldn't do it that is my point.

this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2023
384 points (95.3% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

53024 readers
512 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-FiLiberapay


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS