668
submitted 1 year ago by tsz@lemmy.world to c/sysadmin@lemmy.world

I'm so absolutely sick of it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] grue@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago

You're confusing copyright law with property law. Sure, you can't make and sell copies (fun fact: you can make copies for certain other purposes, though), but that's not a limitation on what you can do with your own copy, which is your property.

Ownership of the right to copy and ownership of the copy itself are entirely different things.

[-] Kushan@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

I'm not confusing copyright law and property law, but you are deliberately conflating them so you can say things like "That's what the copyright cartel claims, but it's a goddamn lie." in response to someone saying that owning a copy of something does not give you the rights to that thing.

[-] grue@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago

The copyright cartel claims you don't own your copy. That's a lie: you do own your copy. Owning a copy of something does, in fact, give you all the rights to that copy, so claiming it doesn't is wrong.

[-] Kushan@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Nobody here is debating if you own the physical copy or not. You're debating the difference between owning a copy and having the rights to it.

this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2023
668 points (97.2% liked)

Sysadmin

7717 readers
92 users here now

A community dedicated to the profession of IT Systems Administration

No generic Lemmy issue posts please! Posts about Lemmy belong in one of these communities:
!lemmy@lemmy.ml
!lemmyworld@lemmy.world
!lemmy_support@lemmy.ml
!support@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS