44
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2023
44 points (95.8% liked)
Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.
5185 readers
829 users here now
Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.
As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:
How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:
Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:
Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
yeah i think it's like around -42 C that most of them you can't run anymore? so you need another heat source during times when you get that low, which up north is obviously more common
Heat pumps are efficient at very low temperatures now, and are suitable for the vast majority of homes.
However, in the literal Arctic you probably will need an additional heat source. This could be resistive electric, but tbh so few people live that far north that I'd be fine with them using fossil fuels. Their emissions would be a rounding error on a global scale.
If we want to completely ban fossil fuels then biomass could be another option for the Arctic in winter.
From the article, much of the heating oil use is in NB, PEI, and Nova Scotia. The Atlantic climate is well within the limits of heat pump use.
With toaster elements, heat pumps are effective for southern Ontario as well.
Northern communities, not so much.