127
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2023
127 points (96.4% liked)
PC Gaming
8202 readers
823 users here now
For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki
Rules:
- Be Respectful.
- No Spam or Porn.
- No Advertising.
- No Memes.
- No Tech Support.
- No questions about buying/building computers.
- No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
- No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
- No off-topic posts/comments.
- Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Just let it die, Ubisoft.
Singapore keeps throwing money at it, Ubisoft takes it in and let's Ubi Singapore work on that dumpster fire.
You have a source for that? I've only seen Ubi is on the hook for the money used if the game doesn't ship
Nope. The only known "fact" is that Ubisoft was given a grant by Singapore which obligated them to release it at some point. Can't imagine why Ubisoft would keep that thing in development for so long instead of just releasing anything if it wasn't for external money that they don't have to care about.
why?, valve keep the game in development for longer, and in the end if worth, why can't ubisoft do the same?