How does (or should) one respond to “Lemmy = tankies” (lib.lgbt)

submitted 1 year ago by Veraticus@lib.lgbt to c/chat@beehaw.org

45 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I shared my fly.io Lemmy project to Hacker News and one of the first responses was “Lemmy is for tankies.”

This isn’t the first time I’d heard this either. In leaving Reddit and researching alternatives I’d heard it a fair amount.

I think it’s basically untrue; beehaw doesn’t even federate with the big tankie servers. But that seems to require some understanding of what Lemmy actually is.

So… what’s the best way to talk about it and/or get around this optics issue?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] gabuwu@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago

Explain that tankie and extreme political instances are consistently defederated, since its a federated platform. They can just find an instance that doesn't interact with the tankie instances.

[-] JillyB@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

I don't think we can say "consistently" when the largest instance federated with the largest tankie instance.

this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2023

24 points (100.0% liked)

Chat

7499 readers

31 users here now

Relaxed section for discussion and debate that doesn't fit anywhere else. Whether it's advice, how your week is going, a link that's at the back of your mind, or something like that, it can likely go here.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

AskBeehaw

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

alyaza@beehaw.org

remington@beehaw.org