903
Valve rocks (sh.itjust.works)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Aux@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

They can do that because you pay them when you buy other game remasters.

[-] spez@sh.itjust.works 12 points 9 months ago

yes but so do other huge game companies on cosmetics, in game items, other spin offs. I agree it's not as easy but right now even doing this is unusual for most companies.

[-] yuri@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago

Doesn’t Valve make most of it’s money off the virtual economies of tf2 and counter strike?

[-] Zoomboingding@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Not even close. They get a 30% cut of ALL SALES ON STEAM.

[-] Moneo@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

No they make most of their money taking cuts from games sold on steam, afaik. CS2 probably makes lots too but I really hope TF2 doesn't. (I'm still salty they left TF2 to rot)

[-] echo64@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Very few game companies actually make a lot of money from cosmetics and ingame items. Most don't.

It's also stupid to think companies should do things for free. That's not the world we live in. It's an exception

[-] Sami_Uso@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago

I just did a minimal amount of googling and this is absolutely not true. Micro transactions have outpaced full game sales by almost 3:1. The entire model of free to play games relies on microtransactions. The biggest games in the world right now are f2p games or paid games with f2p models. I dunno where you're getting your info from, ancedotally, I'm sure, and maybe you just don't play games like that... But the rest of the casual game player population absolutely does.

[-] AeroLemming@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago

They might mean that the majority of games NOT weighted by popularity don't have microtransactions. Think about all the indie games that only get like 10,000 downloads and are just small, pleasant games. Of course, most games have microtransactions if you weight them by popularity.

[-] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

Very few game companies actually make a lot of money from cosmetics and ingame items. Most don't.

The companies doing these full price remasters 100% are the ones making millions from cosmetics.

[-] PunnyName@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

Cosmetics and in-game items (microtransactions) are how games make money hand-over-fist.

What world do you live in?

[-] echo64@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

some very few games make money

[-] PunnyName@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Ok, you've made the claim that MOST games DON'T make any money off of cosmetics and microtransactions.

Name 5.

5 games that sell skins or other in-game items that actually lose money, or break even.

[-] iesou@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago

That first point is not true at all. There are entire games built around the paid cosmetics. League of Legends and everyone who follows that model for example. There are more than a few, but you're right on the second point. I mean it's not nice to call people stupid, but I suppose that's not what we're discussing.

[-] echo64@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

My first point is that there are very few companies that actually make money from this, not that there are no companies. Riot games is one that does make money.

[-] DroneRights@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Then why did Microsoft charge 60 dollars for the Halo remasters?

this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2023
903 points (97.6% liked)

Greentext

3705 readers
1603 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS