Selfhosted

60177 readers

709 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

Be civil.
No spam.
Posts are to be related to self-hosting.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.
Submission headline should match the article title.
No trolling.
Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

curbstickle@anarchist.nexus

curbstickle_lw@lemmy.world

128

Are all these thousands of lemmy servers useless? (lemmy.world)

submitted 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) by Averrin@lemmy.world to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

162 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Correct me if I'm wrong. I read ActivityPub standards and dug a little into lemmy sources to understand how federation works. And I'm a bit disappointed. Every server just has a cache and the ability to fetch something from another known server. So if you start your own instance, there is no profit for the whole network until you have a significant piece of auditory (e.g. private instances or servers with no users). Are there any "balancers" to utilize these empty instances? Should we promote (or create in the first place) a way how to passively help lemmy with such fast growth?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] deadcyclo@lemmy.world 5 points 3 years ago (1 children)

I'm not sure your second paragraph is correct. First of all, it's "just in time" so will only be replicated if somebody on that instance is following it. But more importantly, I read a statement from a server owner somewhere that the software purges older content regularly (and refetches is "just in time" when somebody tries to view the old content) to keep storage size down.

[–] JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 3 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (2 children)

If this is the case, then wouldn't his fitst paragraph be incorrect also? Because if it is "just in time" with quick purging, the main server still has to constantly serve the instance server the content. It would only be beneficial if many instance users are trying to view the exact same content at around the same time (so for the "massive" communities maybe?)

[–] deadcyclo@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago

From my understanding you are correct. Each instance is responsible for serving all of the content of the communities created on it. So many small instances with a smaller amount of communities = good, a few huge instances with lots of communities = bad.

[–] majorswitcher@lemmyfly.org 1 points 3 years ago

The purging of older content is good news I didn’t know that.