29
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] DanielaKEngert@hachyderm.io 1 points 11 months ago
[-] lysdexic@programming.dev 1 points 11 months ago

It doesn't look like it, otherwise you'd be aware that the whole point of this submission is that casting return values with std::move disables RVO.

[-] DanielaKEngert@hachyderm.io 1 points 11 months ago

@lysdexic You claimed otherwise:
"
These std::move invocations are harmless, as they only cast objects to their rvalue reference.
"
If you were right, we wouldn't have the motivation to look at this in EWG.

[-] lysdexic@programming.dev 1 points 11 months ago

If you were right, we wouldn’t have the motivation to look at this in EWG.

I am right. Not benefiting from RVO does not mean you're harming anyone.

Again, I recommend you read the submission and also the discussion.

this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2023
29 points (96.8% liked)

C++

1732 readers
1 users here now

The center for all discussion and news regarding C++.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS