Which license leads to more contribution: MIT or GPL? (monero.town)

submitted 8 months ago by jack@monero.town to c/opensource@lemmy.ml

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Suppose I want my project to have as many contributors as possible. Generally do you think more people are inclined to contribute (upstream) if the code is permissive or copyleft or do you think it doesn't really matter?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] fafff@lemmy.ml 34 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I am happier when I see copyleft but let’s be honest, I would contribute to an interesting, useful project regardless of their choice between MIT and GPL. Same for companies: some prefer MIT, but there is no way they are not going to contribute to the Linux Kernel just because of copyleft. So bottom line is: make something that people enjoy/find useful and see contributors flocking.

CLAs are a different matter: I do not contribute to projects which ask you to assign them copyright unless I 100% trust the organisation behind them.