554
WATER (sopuli.xyz)
submitted 11 months ago by hellfire103@sopuli.xyz to c/memes@sopuli.xyz
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago

So I know this is just a meme but it's oxygen really the only reason fire can exist? Like don't other things burn on their own with no oxygen present?

[-] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 25 points 11 months ago

There are other chemical reactions that produce heat, but fire is specifically a rapid oxidation. There are other oxidizers though that can result in an oxidation type reaction though, a few are even better than oxygen at it even, like fluorine (which is why pure fluorine is such dangerous stuff)

[-] KuraiWolfGaming@pawb.social 7 points 11 months ago

Chlorine Trifluoride is a better oxidizer than Oxygen itself. Hell, the germans in WW2 tried making self igniting flamethrowers with the stuff. But stopped because it was too nasty to work with.

At that point, they might as well just spray it directly on people. Screw using a fuel to ignite when the trifluoride is enough to set fire to literally anything. Even wet sand can be burnt by it.

[-] snugglesthefalse@sh.itjust.works 8 points 11 months ago

Which reminds me of this quote "It is, of course, extremely toxic, but that’s the least of the problem. It is hypergolic with every known fuel, and so rapidly hypergolic that no ignition delay has ever been measured. It is also hypergolic with such things as cloth, wood, and test engineers, not to mention asbestos, sand, and water-with which it reacts explosively. It can be kept in some of the ordinary structural metals-steel, copper, aluminium, etc.-because of the formation of a thin film of insoluble metal fluoride which protects the bulk of the metal, just as the invisible coat of oxide on aluminium keeps it from burning up in the atmosphere. If, however, this coat is melted or scrubbed off, and has no chance to reform, the operator is confronted with the problem of coping with a metal-fluorine fire. For dealing with this situation, I have always recommended a good pair of running shoes. "

[-] KuraiWolfGaming@pawb.social 2 points 11 months ago

Yes, from the book Ignition! by John Clark. Also quoted by Derek Lowe in an entry of his "Things I Won't Work With" articles.

[-] Literati@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

And why it makes great rocket fuel...

...if you ignore all the other side effects

[-] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago

There can be a release of energy without oxygen, but it will not result in a fire, just an explosion. You can make arguments for things like the sun "burning" in the vacuum of space, but that is fusion, and a far different thing than lighting a match.

[-] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

Fair and as for the sun I've always seen it as more of just a constant nuclear explosion.

[-] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago
[-] flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 months ago

That never makes sense to me!

It blows my mind, really. My own intuitive understanding of gravity just doesn't extend to that kind of reality (he says with a broken collar bone due to essentially 'too much gravity')

[-] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

The really serious trouble with reality has always been that it is under no obligation to make sense to random hominids

[-] flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago

Yes, i completely agree...

I demand to see the manager!

[-] TheChurn@kbin.social 12 points 11 months ago

There are plenty of things that can cause fires that are not oxygen, and don't contain oxygen.

The halogens, Fluorine and Chlorine in particular, are powerful oxidizing agents on their own and can produce flames in the same manner as common flames.

Here's a report on the spectra of flames produced by combustion in a Fluorine atmosphere (PDF warning).

[-] Chetzemoka@startrek.website 1 points 11 months ago

Now I need a NileRed video on combustion in a fluorine atmosphere.

(Also, props to your username. I see you, fam.)

[-] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

Some metals (the ones that require super special fire extinguishers) can keep an exothermic reaction going (magnesium I believe, and sodium I'm pretty sure) but rapid oxidation (rusting) is the most common method of combustion.

Oxygen is so combustible that it's toxic to life, and would have killed life as it was a billion years ago (number from my ass) which produced oxygen as a byproduct of photosynthesis if it weren't for the development of mitochondria.

A few other things (elements) can burn without oxygen, but not many, and they normally need a pretty large activation temperature.

[-] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

So is it just the definition of "fire" itself? Like only something burning with oxygen is "fire" but if it's another fuel source it's not technically "fire" but we call it fire anyway?

[-] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

Burning with oxygen is oxidation, things oxidize when the element oxygen binds with another element, which it's very prone to doing. Oxidation with iron is rust, it just happens much more slowly (but still exothermically) than when biological compound oxidize they release energy more rapidly, rapidly enough to cause other nearby organic bonds to break and expose themselves to sites for more oxidation to take place.

There can be electrical fires, chemical fires, classic fires, and self fueling fires (the kind you were originally asking about). There are probably more categories now. Always be sure to use the proper fire extinguisher for the fire at hand.

[-] atocci@kbin.social 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I can't find anything that says it's not considered fire if it's not burning with oxygen, just that a fuel needs to be oxidizing and combusting, and the definition of oxidation has expanded so it doesn't necessarily require actual oxygen anymore (even though that's how the word originated).

Here's a neat clip I found of hydrogen-chlorine fire.

[-] CJOtheReal@ani.social 3 points 11 months ago

There are very few things that burn without oxygen and are not self oxygenating

[-] DroneRights@lemm.ee 0 points 11 months ago

The reason things don't burn underwater is there's no oxygen down there. So if you're asking whether things can burn underwater? Mostly no.

this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2023
554 points (96.5% liked)

Memes

8252 readers
729 users here now

Post memes here.

A meme is an idea, behavior, or style that spreads by means of imitation from person to person within a culture and often carries symbolic meaning representing a particular phenomenon or theme.

An Internet meme or meme, is a cultural item that is spread via the Internet, often through social media platforms. The name is by the concept of memes proposed by Richard Dawkins in 1972. Internet memes can take various forms, such as images, videos, GIFs, and various other viral sensations.


Laittakaa meemejä tänne.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS