178
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by Subject6051@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

The media won't give me great answers to this question and I think this I trust this community more, thus I want to know from you. Also, I have heard reports that Russia was winning the war, if that's true, did the west miscalculate the situation by allowing diplomacy to take a backseat and allowing Ukraine to a large plethora of military resources?

PS: I realize there are many casualties on both sides and I am not trying to downplay the suffering, but I am curious as to how it is going for Ukraine. Right now I am hearing ever louder calls of Russia winning, those have existed forever, but they seem to have grown louder now, so I was wondering what you thought about it. Also, I am somewhat concerned of allowing a dictatorship to just erase at it's convenience a free and democratic country.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ICastFist@programming.dev 23 points 8 months ago

I'd say the only ones winning are those selling stuff to Ukraine and Russia. I also remember a panel some months ago, about how the other EU countries will help rebuild Ukraine once the war is over. To me, it looked like they were already slicing the not even dead body in order to profit off it.

Ukraine as a whole is at a bigger loss, given all the infrastructure damage and population losses, this one counting both deaths and people fleeing the country.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 2 points 8 months ago

How is rebuilding a country equivalent to slicing it up?

[-] wewbull@feddit.uk 5 points 8 months ago

Slicing it up like slicing a cake. Dividing up the profits between themselves. Rebuilding a country doesn't happen for free you know. There's no depths to the debt the west can plunge Ukraine into over this war, unless we force Russia to pay. I hear they have lots of oil.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com -1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

What a terrible analogy. It implies that "rebuilding" Ukraine will actually involve destroying it just because people are paid to do the work.

[-] ICastFist@programming.dev 1 points 8 months ago

Ukraine will likely lack the money to pay for the work for decades, so they'll likely have to compromise with treaties and concessions beyond the reconstruction work. The more likely result will be a very weak government that'll have to concede to several wants of the companies working there, who will use their money to put political EU pressure on Ukraine.

It implies that “rebuilding” Ukraine will actually involve destroying it just because people are paid to do the work.

You can only rebuild what has been damaged or destroyed and the companies that offered help see future profits going up with every building that crumbles. None of them are doing anything out of goodwill, they just see money to be made.

this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2023
178 points (88.7% liked)

Asklemmy

43027 readers
1460 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS