852
submitted 10 months ago by filoria@lemmy.ml to c/world@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] DampSquid@feddit.uk 33 points 10 months ago

If you can afford a holiday home, you have enough of an advantage already

[-] Marsupial@quokk.au 13 points 10 months ago

Mate, I earn below median wage and I could buy a “holiday home”. This isn’t something fancy, it’s a shitty old house in the bush.

What I can’t afford is a house where jobs and people are, the city.

[-] dojan@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago

I think a lot of people hear holiday home and think like, tropical bungalow. A holiday home here in Sweden usually won't have a sewage connection, and oftentimes not even running water. You'd have to use a potty and bring potable water yourself. You could get these pretty cheap so long as you're in a position where you have some money left over after expenses.

A proper house will easily be 10x the amount a holiday home is.

There are fancier ones of course, that can basically double as a home. Anyone I know that has such a thing owns it as a family (as in grandparents, siblings, etc.).

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 months ago

I think people are picturing that, because that's what's been happening elsewhere; foreign investors using luxury real estate as an investment.

[-] dojan@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Well yes, not saying those aren’t a thing, but they’re not the only type of holiday homes. It’s not unfeasible for a normal person living above subsistence to be able to afford a holiday home.

Saying “oh you have a holiday home you’ve enough of an advantage” doesn’t really work in all cases.

[-] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 10 points 10 months ago

A holiday home is a second home. If you don't have a home already and that's what you purchase, it's not your holiday home, it's your only home.

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

They mention "the city", I interpret it as the same situation as what used to be mine, owned my main residence in a city but not in THE city so prices are lower but most jobs are outside of the city I lived in, that allowed me to buy a second residence out in the woods for cheap, but I couldn't live there full time (no water in winter, floor isn't insulated).

[-] Marsupial@quokk.au 1 points 10 months ago

If you don’t live there, it’s not your home.

[-] guacupado@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

You're almost there.

Just a little further.

[-] Marsupial@quokk.au 0 points 10 months ago

You don’t get it mate.

It’s okay though.

[-] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago
[-] Marsupial@quokk.au 1 points 10 months ago

In the house I rent?

[-] minorninth@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

So wouldn’t the fees be proportional to the price? The added taxes on a tiny cheap holiday home would be cheap too.

this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2023
852 points (99.2% liked)

World News

38790 readers
3453 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS