1268

While they were happy with what the fairphone 4 brought to the table, they seem to like what was changed for the fairphone 5.
What are you guys' opinions on this? A welcome change? would you get one if your phone died within the next year?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] alvvayson@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago

The Fairphone 4 supports /e/.

It seems graphene is limiting itself to Pixel devices. The developer is also mostly a one man show, so I don't think he has the capacity to support many devices. He's probably just busy keeping up with Pixel devices as-is.

What I would like to know is, how do /e/ and GrapheneOS compare.

Can't really find info on that.

[-] jane232@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 8 months ago

Calyx Os supports the FP4 and announced support for the FP5

That just to be said.

I have e os on FP4 and I would describe my experience as follows: Do you want to switch from IOS to Android without loosing the style of the launcher and gain some privacy? Go for it

If you want an Android that does a lot for you and give you tools like a vpn, a tracker blocker ect... Go for it

If you want to customize your experience (e.g. have an "normal" Android launcher, switch accent colors ...) ? You get a very rocky experience to say the best.

And at least for the FP4, some stock apps like the Cam were just not working, but to be fair it seemed like that was a suppychain problem...

I consider changing to calyx Os, expecting to get a more customizable Android.

[-] miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago

Is e os able to use all the camera lenses? That's one problem I have with custom roms, they're often unable to hook into the camera API in order to use anything other than the main back and front camera

[-] jane232@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Had to check real quick: Yes in the current Version of the stock cam it does recognise all cameras and even takes snappy pictures. That was the problem before but it seems to be patched.

Anyways due to this problem i switched to gcam

[-] miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Such a shame that this kind of issue is a thing in the first place. I'd love to use a Fairphone and slap DivestOS on it, but potentially losing two lenses I paid for isn't great at all

[-] jane232@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 8 months ago

I think that should work, due to DivestOS being a fork of LinageOS just like eOS, and in fact the camera of eOS is just the cam of LinageOS (thats what i meant with supplychain problem). So i assume that DivestOS might just have the same camera app as eOS

But you could probably confirm that by looking into the repos

[-] miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago

Now that you say it, I've never thought about the default cam, I've always been using OpenCamera

[-] jane232@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 8 months ago

Yeaa but the open tool being sold for profit they are not my go to apps anymore...

But I still need to switch my calendar to the newly made fork

[-] miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago

Do you mean simplemobiletools? OpenCamera is not part of that, I believe theirs is called Simple Camera

[-] jane232@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 8 months ago

Ohh you are right, I mixed that up...

[-] miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago

So I just installed the default lineage cam again, and would you look at that, it can use both lenses on my OnePlus 5T. Would love to have more manual controls though.

Thank you so much for reminding me this app exists

[-] jane232@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 8 months ago

Yes that's what drove me to gcam

[-] miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago

Oh well, having aurora store installed for one single app isn't worth it to me. My second lens is for night mode shots, and I barely use that. It's just nice to have access to it at all.

[-] jane232@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 8 months ago

I actually installed gcam via apk

[-] miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago

True, that's an option too. Just not one you can trust as much, which is what turns me off.

[-] helenslunch@feddit.nl 8 points 8 months ago

They limit themselves to Pixel devices because they have by far and away the best hardware security. Same reason for Calyx.

It's mostly definitely not a one man operation and the guy you're likely referring to has left the project.

[-] alvvayson@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Thanks, today I learned.

How do Calyx and Graphene compare?

I see Calyx does support Fairphone.

[-] jane232@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 8 months ago

I would like that as well. In fact I'd like to switch to Calyx, but from eOS.

[-] Dezorian@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 8 months ago

Check out iode.tech as well. Like /e/OS, also a lineage OS variant but with build in firewall which you can customize (or turn off). Fast security updates and great default informed FOSS apps (unlike /e/OS).

this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2023
1268 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

57175 readers
4075 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS