1045
Parkable cities (startrek.website)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 37 points 7 months ago

They have transit to back that up though. There are plenty of smallish towns and rural areas that don't have any transit at all.

[-] rekabis@programming.dev 66 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

At the same time, those towns are hella compact, such that 90+% of residents can walk to pretty much any retailer or store or other resource within 15-20 minutes. Yes, some people (farmers) live outside of town and there are some American-style housing in clumps outside of the town, but everyone mostly lives in tight clusters.

And even the tiny towns well away from other larger towns have busses that move people between towns on a fairly regular If infrequent basis (15-20 minutes apart). Only the larger population centres can afford to have public transport that comes every 5 minutes or so.

You also have to understand that in North America, a “significant separation between towns” is something like 100+km. In Germany, that term qualifies with as little as a 10km distance. It’s rare to find any population centre that is more than 20km away from its nearest neighbour.

[-] macarthur_park@lemmy.world 17 points 7 months ago

fairly regular If infrequent basis (15-20 minutes apart)

lol that’s the frequency that the busses and trains near me operate during peak commute times. I finally broke down and bought a car. I’m American if you couldn’t tell…

[-] Kase@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

Oof, in my city there's one route that's 40 minutes, and the rest are an hour+

If I lived in a different spot or had kids or anything, it'd be impossible for me to take the bus. I don't blame people who don't use it. It's mostly used by homeless people.

It's getting better though, slowly but surely :)

[-] doingthestuff@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

It doesn't even exist near me and the roads aren't even walkable. I'm in a relatively big city but on the edge of the suburbs.

[-] Kase@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Yeah, that's what really sucks. I grew up in a similar place, and for me it's a thousand times better to live in a place with transit (and, y'know, sidewalks...), regardless of how little funding it gets. Sorry :(

[-] doingthestuff@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

Yeah I've lived in Germany and the Netherlands and also big US cities with mediocre transit. Having zero non-car options sucks, especially as regulation and other economic factors are making the cost of cars outpace our already crazy inflation.

load more comments (26 replies)
[-] Cheesus@lemmy.ca 16 points 7 months ago

I live in France, about 30 minutes from a major city. There is transit, but it's not good, and has very few stops near where I live. Grocery shopping has to be done by car or bike as there aren't any shops in the village. European cities are extremely well served by transit, but outside the metropolitan areas, cars are still king.

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works -5 points 7 months ago

It's a really interesting thread. Cities are great, suburb & rural can be great and transit is great. 15 minute cities are great goals, but it's not a one size fits all situation. I can't figure out how they think these utopian 15 minute cities would work if they don't have a working transit built in. It's so weird, do they think handicapped people can bike and walk everywhere or don't exist? Do they think parents love sending their kids down the block to play by themselves instead of the backyard? Their choices aren't going to make sense for a ton of people. They're either right out of school or trolling, I can't tell which.

[-] ssorbom@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago

It’s so weird, do they think handicapped people can bike and walk everywhere or don’t exist?

As a handicapped person myself, it really baffles me how people think car oriented infrastructure is so much better for us. I am a wheelchair user, and I live in a 15 minute neighborhood. Getting around in my wheelchair is a million times simpler there than in my old car-centric suburb, because the same disabilities that make me wheelchair bound also prevent me from driving. Which mean that in a car-centric environment I do one of the following:

a) Rely on the generosity of friends and family to cart me around at their convenience, or b) Utilize shared access rides, which are door to door, but take longer than using public transit, or c) Roll myself to underserved suburban bus stops over badly maintained sidewalk, and pray I make it on time.

None of which are appealing.

Meanwhile, in my 15 minute city:

  • The buses often run at 10 to 15 minute intervals (vs 30 to 60 minutes in the suburb),
  • Sidewalks are larger
  • I have less distance to travel in the first place
[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 months ago

And you're not blind and don't have a caretaker I assume.

[-] Katana314@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

Handicapped people are more affected by the inverse. Small cities are great, car-centric communes are terrible for them. They've worked out their own mobility issues, but those solutions are interrupted when the crosswalks and pedestrian bridges are affected. If the "solution" involves getting in and out of a car repeatedly, it's often cumbersome for people in wheelchairs.

The point on kids really relates more to neighborhood safety, and how often people interact with a community. Often, kids should be trusted to go down the street to the park. All our old Saturday newspaper comics involve kids going places themselves on foot or bike instead of constantly "being dropped off".

[-] sbv@sh.itjust.works 7 points 7 months ago

I can't figure out how they think these utopian 15 minute cities would work if they don't have a working transit built in. It's so weird

Isn't the assumption that the 15 minute city is a neighbourhood in a functional city? There should be transit.

It's so weird, do they think handicapped people can bike and walk everywhere or don't exist?

I lived in something like a fifteen minute neighbourhood. I saw people in wheelchairs around. They appeared to use the same amenities as everyone else.

Do they think parents love sending their kids down the block to play by themselves instead of the backyard?

Our kids preferred going to playgrounds because the toys and play structures were better. And they ran into kids they knew.

Their choices aren't going to make sense for a ton of people.

I'm not sure what would be bad about a fifteen minute neighbourhood. It's just a normal neighbourhood, with stores, schools, work, and civic infrastructure.

As far as I can tell, a fifteen minute neighbourhood only adds to what exists, rather than taking away.

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 0 points 7 months ago

There should be transit.

No, there are people in this thread saying that 15 minute cities are the transit. You'd think that would be the case.

As far as I can tell, a fifteen minute neighbourhood only adds to what exists, rather than taking away.

Look again at this thread, lol.

Neighborhoods that promote no cars would be great as long as they have the transit to back it up, imo as well.

Dig deeper and you'll see the crazy.

[-] dustyData@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

You never even seen the Netherlands, have you? Also, what I tell everyone who comes up with these kind of non-questions, no one is taking your car away. Cars still exist in Europe, but they are not the default, they are used for what they make sense, making irregular trips of 100+Km. But chances are, that there is a train that serves the route anyway.

Handicapped people: most have access to electric micro-mobility vehicles that are legal to use on bike lanes. For those who can't use micro vehicles, there's still cars, and vans. They still exists. They weren't magicked away.

Kids: My sister lives in the outskirts of Madrid, her neighborhood is littered with dozens of parks of all kinds, all less than 10 minute walks. My 10 y.o. nephew can go on his own to many parks without ever having to set foot on asphalt, cross a road or get on neither a bus or a car. He has never had to play on a street. They live in an urban tower that, while they don't have a personal green cancer backyard, they have a skatepark, a playground, a pet park, sport courts (tennis, badminton, soccer and basketball), a running trail and a botanical garden, all within walking distance.

[-] Naja_Kaouthia@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

The first time I went to Amsterdam I was very surprised to see children just wandering about coming from or going to a nearby park. It’s not something you really see here in the US.

[-] TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id 2 points 7 months ago

Not anymore. It used to be the rule in the US. Even as recently as the 70s and 80s when I was a kid, we'd be gone from home all day everyday when not in school, just roaming around town and keeping ourselves entertained, usually on bikes or skateboards. We got up to a lot of mischief and hijinks, but nothing too serious, and we had a great time doing it.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] echo64@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago

I enjoy when someone shows up to prove the meme true

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works -4 points 7 months ago

That the US doesn't have great transit? You're totally correct. :)

[-] echo64@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

That you can't imagine how it possibly could.

You think the rest of the world just, I guess, found the natural transit in the ground? The rest of the world built public transit systems to satisfy the people. America did not, to satisfy the companies.

to pre-empt the standard responses:

"america is very big", yes yes so is the rest of the world, we managed.

"America isn't as dense", yup the rest of the world has low densities, too. We still build infrastructure, though

"It's very expensive and we already bought a car and made all these empty dead suburban environments, it would take people three hours by bus to get to a store", yup America made its choices there, the rest of the world zones so that people live near the infrastructure they need and can get the things they need via transit.

[-] TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id 2 points 7 months ago

You have a very rosy view of "the rest of the world." The truth is that "the rest of the world" includes a vast array of different urban environments, some of which are very well-planned and executed, and others of which are, not so much, shall we say. This binary between the US and "the rest of the world" is bullshit and is intellectually lazy. I can only think that you have no formal education in urban studies.

[-] echo64@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

The binary is between the parts of the world that had the resources and technology to build mass transit and decided not to, and the rest of the world that did. It just happens to fall into America vs. the rest of the world.

I don't know why you want to throw in jabs about random people's education level. That is super weird.

[-] algorithmae -5 points 7 months ago

I can't believe you managed to fit all those words in their mouth. That's kinda impressive. Like word tetris.

this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2023
1045 points (96.2% liked)

Microblog Memes

5135 readers
1822 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS