306
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2023
306 points (97.5% liked)
Games
16647 readers
910 users here now
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
- News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
- Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
- No humor/memes etc..
- No affiliate links
- No advertising.
- No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
- No self promotion.
- No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
- No politics.
Comments.
- No personal attacks.
- Obey instance rules.
- No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
- Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Other communities:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Wotlk WoW era Blizzard was a failing company? In what metric?
Money makers like OW2/Diablo Immortal aren't designed for the majority either, but for the 1% willing to spend exorbitant amounts of money. He made a successful studio develop into a souless money printing machine.
Edit: If you want to credit him with everything Blizzard's achieved since his tenure, why not also credit him with sinking Blizzard's reputation into the ground for the current generation of youths, ensuring that whoever comes after will have nothing to work with?
Not defending kotick but, isn't that what a big corp CEO's job is? Make money for the shareholders, at any cost? I hate what he's done. But I don't see a point in bashing him for doing exactly what your typical scum big corp CEO does.
No. It's not generally the CEOs job to cover up rapes and sexual assaults. There's a line and Kotick crossed it. Whatever money he made wasn't worth the shit he did. If you participate in covering up for rapists you are not serving your shareholders, you're destroying the reputation of the company as soon as what you have been doing gets out. Which is exactly what happened and led directly to Microsoft taking the company over.
Short term profit is great, but if I was a shareholder I'd rather get a Bezos or Murdoch making sustainable scummy decisions rather than a Kotick or Musk damaging the company's long term reputation and haemorrhaging skilled workers in the process. I believe Kotick is lacking as an 'ideal' scum big corp CEO, as do his workers and Microsoft.