232
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] PugJesus@kbin.social 14 points 11 months ago

America wasn't particularly friendly towards Israel until the 70s, though.

And to be fair, much of the Arab world has wanted to destroy Israel.

We have little sway in that matter, though. Israel survived before we lent them assistance, and they were much worse off back then, and their enemies much more determined.

[-] NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social 10 points 11 months ago

Good! The let’s stop selling them weapons, withdraw our carriers, and let them deal with the consequences of their actions on their own.

It is really fucking easy to do what you want, to be ho you want, with no repercussions when you have the worlds strongest military backing you.

The little fuckers wouldn’t have enough balls to do what they have been doing without our backing.

For fucks sake, they are so scared and cowardly that they are shooting innocent hostages, with their shirts off, hands up and a white flag in them.

[-] PugJesus@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago

Good! The let’s stop selling them weapons, withdraw our carriers, and let them deal with the consequences of their actions on their own.

I mean, shit, you won't find any disagreement from me. As far as I'm concerned, Israel should be treated as a hostile actor to the US.

The little fuckers wouldn’t have enough balls to do what they have been doing without our backing.

Don't know about that, though.

[-] FanciestPants@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Cutting off all military aid to Israel would definitely make us feel better for a minute, but I think your post accurately points out that what comes next is likely to be much worse. One genocide may turn into a different genocide as the regional powers decide it's open season on Israel. Then once Israel is facing probable eradication, the US is faced with allowing the destruction of Israel (including Israelis that oppose the current actions of their state), or getting back into a conflict, now with many more regional forces, and possibly nation states involved.

I absolutely agree with you that the IDF's actions are abhorrent and consistent with war crimes as I understand international agreement (which is only layman's understanding), but Bibi appears to be playing chicken with the entire population of Israel, and Biden may have blinked after considering the consequences.

[-] NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago

Those are the consequences of their actions, let the smart ones get out and the war hawks get what they paid for.

this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2024
232 points (90.3% liked)

politics

19244 readers
2700 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS