33
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2024
33 points (100.0% liked)
guns
2411 readers
19 users here now
Rules (Under review):
-
- NO BUYING, SELLING OR TRADING of guns or accessories. Take that to Reddit and /r/GunAccessoriesForSale or Armslist.com
-
- Censor all personally identifiable information in posts including serial numbers on firearms.
-
- Any post or comment advocating illegal action will be removed and the poster warned. A second infraction will result in a ban.
-
- Unironically suggesting the SKS as a usable rifle in the 21st Century when there are things like the AK and AR that cost only a bit more might result in a ban, it depends on how we feel.
-
- Discussion of hunting is acceptable but please put "CW: hunting" in post titles. Debating the ethicality of hunting is also fine, but keep it civil and don't derail other people's threads.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
Sigs quality has gone way down and I would think it’s mostly because they have the most current government contracts for their SPEAR rifle and their 320 style pistol. They don’t have to worry about regular customer services anymore really so I doubt this will change for the foreseeable future.
Ah, that makes sense. I haven't been in the market for a new gun in a while, so thanks. I'll probably go CZ in the future.
No problem. If you look up the sig 300 (320, 365 etc.) series on gun forum and stuff you’ll see a lot of people with defective guns.
Didn’t they or the government get sued by Glock because the Sig pistol was chosen by the military before the gun trials were even concluded? Lmao. Definitely nothing shady going on there!
Didn’t hear about that, but if they did lol, lmfao even.
Apparently Sig won the contract before the final performance tests were performed with their guns and Glock’s. The military concluded Sig had a marginal performance advantage, but their price was also like $100 million cheaper compared to Glock’s lol.