438
submitted 11 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

As Donald Trump dominates the GOP nomination race and some of his inflammatory comments find favor with the party faithful, CBS News measured how the public feels about his "poisoning the blood" language. A striking number of voters agree with this description of immigrants who enter the U.S. illegally, and among Republicans, associating the remarks with Trump himself makes them even likelier to agree.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] PugJesus@kbin.social 164 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

"Most Republicans are literal fucking fascists."

I wish I could say I was surprised.

and among Republicans, associating the remarks with Trump himself makes them even likelier to agree.

But it's not a cult. /s

[-] takeda@lemmy.world 40 points 11 months ago

Those people were always there but in a small enough number that they were themselves ashamed to admit it.

What trump did is he united all those people together into a larger group.

It is crazy, but before he won primaries in 2016, the GOP was actually opening to accept LGBT, and they believed they would lose without expanding their base. trump show that they didn't have to.

[-] PugJesus@kbin.social 33 points 11 months ago

Bring back shame for these fucking cretins.

[-] thantik@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

I mean, hasn't it grown way beyond the definition of a cult by being like...half of the US? It's fucked up, sure - but aren't cults by definition generally "small"?

This is millions of people. I'm not excusing it, it's fucked. But I feel like "cult" only serves to place it in a light of "oh this is only a few crazy people"...nah...this is HALF of the USA. You should be gearing up to fight your neighbors if this shit lands. It's not some silly little group like the word 'cult' implies.

[-] PugJesus@kbin.social 17 points 11 months ago

I mean, one describes Mussolini as having a cult of personality, but that was still most of 1930s Italy following him. I think cult is still appropriate.

[-] timmy_dean_sausage@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago

It's not half of the US population. It's around 30% of eligible voters (as of 2022). That's still a huge number of people (74 million), but it's a lot less than half..

[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Yeah, it's only half of the people that actually vote, which turns out to be about 30% overall because 40% of us can't be bothered to vote at all.

[-] ech@lemm.ee 8 points 11 months ago

I don't think anyone saying it's a cult is implying it's a small group. I'm not sure that's a fundamental feature of a cult to begin with.

[-] thantik@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Oxford Dictionary lists the definition of "Cult" as

a relatively small group of people having religious beliefs or practices regarded by others as strange or sinister.

And that's what I was taught it meant as well.

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Really? This is the first result from the Oxford Dictionary:

A particular form or system of religious worship or veneration, esp. as expressed in ceremony or ritual directed towards a specified figure

https://www.oed.com/search/dictionary/?scope=Entries&q=cult

[-] JustZ@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Dictionaries differ.

I think that's the most simple version of cult.

Anyone that worshops anything can be called a cult of that thing.

In common usage especially in American English I think the word connotes an unorthodox form of worshipping, and so by that definition it's a small group, otherwise it would just be the orthodoxy.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 3 points 11 months ago

Or just not thinking of the implications. "Dilluting the blood" can given multiple interpretations, almost all of which are racist, but some more racist than others.

A suburban dad who lives across the street from some black neighbors may not think they should be enslaved or killed off, but does wish they would live somewhere else. He might interpret the phrase in that context. Then his daughter might start dating their son, and now he starts ranting at dinner.

He votes for Trump, but Trump is being pushed other people who very much do want to enslave or kill black people.

Even at its height, fascism never had a majority. It barely cobbled together a reasonable sized plurality. If it were just people who supported their policies as stated with few reservations, they wouldn't even have that. Slippery statements like these are there to attract the adjacent right wingers to support actions they never would otherwise.

[-] PugJesus@kbin.social 5 points 11 months ago

A suburban dad who lives across the street from some black neighbors may not think they should be enslaved or killed off, but does wish they would live somewhere else. He might interpret the phrase in that context.

That's still fascism, man. Ethnic cleansing is core to fascism.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Ethnic cleansing usually doesn't mean "move across town". That's a dilution of a heinous act.

[-] sailingbythelee@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago
[-] frezik@midwest.social 2 points 11 months ago

Thanks--mobile spell checker didn't catch that one.

this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2024
438 points (97.6% liked)

politics

19241 readers
1686 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS